
Reality Check
Nomads-
Content Count
1,726 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by Reality Check
-
COUNSELOR DEVIL'S ADVOCATE Objection OVERRULED! "PERsonaL Issues" shaLL not be deaLT with in my court room.*See PAge 8* Your Honour, this Jury member has engaged in misconduct and will result in my client receiving an unfair and impartial trial. This caveman’s wild and undercivilized outbursts are affecting the opinion of the jury. I move to have him replaced as a juror! DARMAN Your motion to have the court date changed is GRANTED!Bring your witness. The defense Objects! Under the constitution, citizens have a right to a fair and speedy trial. My client’s rights have been infringed upon the entire duration of this trial! I have Yet to see any EXHIBITS present, COUNSELORS ATHENA, X_QUIZIT,FORMER SELF-HIRED BARWAAQO and DEVILS ADVOCATE where is your motion to file a COUNTERCLAIM on the accounts of CHARACTER DEFAMATION ? Your honour, as I have previous mentioned there is NO real evidence indicating that my client is guilty! However, I would like to cross-exam Darman’s exhibits if I may: Exhibit A: The plaintiff says “Yo *** is busted again.. You thought I would never find out huh lol..”. This is not real EVIDENCE! We don’t know what my client has been busted for. Judging by the use of lol indicates that my client and the accuser were in good terms with each other and have had previous conversations, so this “e-mail” could be pertaining to another issue (the issue of the unexplained and mysterious sujui girl perhaps?). Exhibit B: The plaintiff claims “Waraa Lakkad, You ma boy” which further supports my previous claim. Exhibit C: here we see the Plaintiff threatening my client for whatever he was “busted” for: “Your saju azz don’t know what your messing with. Just wait and see”. Obviously Darman has personal vendetta against my client. He goes on to say “Watch what’s coming for you”…. This cross-examination of the evidence suggests that Mr.Darman was mad about a particular issue (Mind you, nothing here MILDLY indicating the crime of plagiarism) and had threatened my client! The Plaintiff’s motive to sensationalize the jury opinion will not be tolerated by the defense! I move to throw out this “Evidence” as it is not relevant to this case! **Turning to the prosecutor** Let’s recap rule #6 of the SOL Golden Rules : “6 - Privacy: respect the privacy of others. Do not post other's phone numbers, addresses, pictures, etc., without their permission.” Pay particular attention “etc.” IP addresses would fall into that category.** Looking to the jury** Also, one would have to think how can a regular NOMAD get access to one’s IP address if one does not have moderator or administrative capabilities?
-
*approaches the court* First of all, I'm glad to see that our new prosecutor has been quick on her feet *looking at her K-mart shoes*. I would like to repudiate her proclamations towards my client's: - Admission of guilt - The fact that both sites in question (Kenyan and SOL) are in fact, Public. *looking to the jury* I would like to revoke SOL's Golden rules (which replaces the state laws, since this is a boundriless case). Under Rule #7, which states, "respect the privacy of Others. Do not post their phone numbers, ...., without their permission". Any person with common sense would understand WHY the evidence is dismissable, as we can not examine the ONLY evidence, for it violates this very rule! Also, one must understand that IP addresses are ambiguous in nature. I will give you a personal example: Me and a friend of mine were posting from the same library (different computers) and the admins thought were the same users because we had the library IP address! Also, It is to my understanding that people with the same local internet provider will have similar IP addresses. This can not place my client in the scene of the crime! As for my client's admission of guilty, he does not have to directly or indirectly admit or refute his guilt under law. This is protected by the 5th amendment, the right not to incriminate one's self. As you can see there is NO evidence that suggests my client is guilty of ANY crime **looking over to Mrembo** Besides, it seems to me that my client never met yours. So I ask now the Jury, why did the PLAINTIFF lie to the COURT? I would like to call on DARMAN to the stand for further questioning of this particular issue, and how exactly he got a hold of Nomad's IP address (or from who did he get it). **Looks over to Mrembo, and waves with her carefully manicured hands**
-
A man with potential in many facets of his life! If he has nothing to offer, then why bother?
-
Originally posted by Shaabella: As I pointed out earlier: "YAWN" WHERE THE HELL IS THE EVIDENCE..... :confused: There is no evidence, because its been tainted by lawless searches!
-
Originally posted by Tuujiye: Awards 12.Most disagreed person Award= D.A The most disagreed? :confused:
-
Objection! Cavemen belong in Caves, not in courts! And I am trying to understand how your statement is relevant to the case at hand? Whether or not we belong to the New Wave Feminist Movement of SOL is not the issue, but my client's freedom and liberties! I ask the honourable judge Lucky to make this case a Mistrial on behalf of my client! **sits back down, flipping her long gorgeous locks to the side**
-
*Walks in with her cute blahnik heels and her sharp two piece Gucci suit* I've been hired by the Nomad as his new representative. I have spent considerable time studying the case (all 7 pages) and I think the case should be Dismissed on the grounds that it violated Nomad's civil liberties. **pauses and looks to the jury** Under the 4th amendment, Title III of the Obnimus Crime Control and Safe Street Act of 1968, every citizen has a right to their privacy. An agent/inspector/cop can not search protected records unless accompanied by a warrant, evidence and probable cause, which the accuser Darman did not provide for the court. With that being said, Darman has no case against my client, since he violated the law when he searched my client's IP address [referring to page 2, post 14]. My client should be free of all charges and provided some monetary compensation for emotional distress and slander. In addition, the accuser should be charged with violating my client's right. **Quitely takes a seat beside the sharply dressed Nomad with a satisfied grin **
-
Xalimoos-Whats type of gift do you prefer from a MAN
Reality Check replied to Khayr's topic in General
Diamondz! Need I say more? -
19 Things Sisters can do for Islam in America ( or Canada or Europe)
Reality Check replied to underdog's topic in General
UD, You just like telling women what to do, eh -
Hmmm..Polygomy..in my marriage? I think not! Ladies, make sure that you have that in your contract!
-
OG girl *clap clap*
-
I'm surprised the admins aren't all over this.
-
Nur, Whether I wear a hijab or not, it's quite frankly none of your business. I didn't like your post because many muslim women do not wear the hijab and they are not all ho*s or as you put it "resistor".
-
Darman, Salafis are actually sunnis. Nur, You are taking the name way too literally. And My job here is not to be "polished" and "convincing" ..but rather to express what I really think of your post. You might be creative with your posts, but I was rather disappointed with the lack of it in this one. Peace
-
^ bambina, that is so sweet sister! Thanks. Og, Its ok, we are expanding the feminist army..and there are room for more
-
Only simple minded folks would assume others post in order to hook up. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
-
I never insulted the dude. I have nothing against him. But how can you easily categorize an entire gender like that? In that sense, it seems pretty useless to me. That's just my opinion on the TOPIC being discussed at hand! SalafiOnline, Is that the salafi way?
-
Don Juan DeMarco with Johnny Depp
-
Qac Qaac, I know what I mean. And stop knit picking my posts and read what others have to say as well! Maro Ku dhag !! dang !
-
I guess some brothers are "wounded" from other threads! Lighten up boyz! Somali men, hmmmmmm. To be frankly honest with you, there are a few good men out there. I have met only a few in my lifetime. Men who actually know how to take care of business! Some Somali men really need to get their act together, and stop hiding behind the "Somali" culture or the "deen" to justify their actions of irresponsibility!....and that's all I'm going to say on that matter. Ps: aren't these topics redundant ?
-
Pet Peeves.(what pisses ya off) About SOME women
Reality Check replied to Tuujiye's topic in General
^lmao Garab, don't be mad brother, because this "little girl" got the best of you! I think the admins will take GOOD care of you -
Honey D, Alot of people don't workout to lose weight but to build endurance (like being able to run 5K), gain strength (by weight training) and toning their already normal bodies. Its healthy to exercise EVEN when you are the ideal weight because you are still susceptible to heart disease, high blood pressure, cholestral, diabetes, cancer, etc etc. Raxmah, There is no fitness usa in my area. I use the uni gym which is free to us.
-
UD, You are the common denominator because you started this mysogynistic thread. Garab, You say that most of the guys do have a problem with me. Do you ask yourself why? Is it because I respond back to these types of threads that* belittle and oppress Somali women by telling them what they should do? Is it because I strongly oppose certain male SOL posters with sexist tendencies? hmmmm..........Well den, hope you enjoy drinking that HATERADE! :cool: Ps: I really am an angel!
-
hmmm.. Fix the ever-expanding holes in the Ozone!