Sign in to follow this  
xiinfaniin

A Dark Day for the Survival of Humanity

Recommended Posts

We need to define very precisely the term "gay" before stating "people are born gay" and other unscientific nonsense.

If gay ect was not a social construct (just as "ADHD" is the new term for kids being naturally kids and active), whole societies, not least old greek ones such as Sparta, would not be "gay".

We would not be having married spouses leaving their partners and becoming "gay" too (or vice-versa).

 

Clearly men and women interacting between themselves is as old as humanity while these terms and utterly nonsensical statements are more recent (the whole psychiatry field is a scam, under big pharma influence, for instance).

 

So what exactely, scientifically being gay means (outside self-serving pseudo- studies)?

 

A more fundamental issue is, if any primitive instinct should be gratified and excused, why would be cannibalism under consent (yes, there are real cases), incest or any other one be prohibited then under "public morality"?

 

Is even homosexual practice medically safe (clearly, it is extremely risky) or sound in providing children with stable family relationships, arguably their single most important right in any ideological system?

 

If gayness is not a clear cut, scientific term, (eg such as being born with sickle cell or others genetic conditions), and its practice is so medically unsafe, yet not propitious to optimal family structure, why should it be not discouraged instead of being lobbied for?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tutu   

And Obama wants to import this sickness to the shores of Africa.

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2350074/Obama-makes-emotional-visit-slave-shipping-port-just-hours-clashing-Senegalese-president-countrys-anti-gay-laws.html

 

A report released Monday by Amnesty International says 38 African countries criminalize homosexuality.

 

In four of those - Mauritania, northern Nigeria,
southern Somalia
and Sudan - the punishment is death.

Is the punishment different in northern Somalia?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tallaabo   

tutu;964900 wrote:
And Obama wants to import this sickness to the shores of Africa.

 

 

 

 

Is the punishment different in northern Somalia?

There is no law against homosexuality in Somaliland. It is legal in that sense and the only thing that needs to be done is to legislate for gay marriage:p

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tallaabo   

Abu-Salman;964897 wrote:
We need to define very precisely the term "gay" before stating "people are born gay" and other unscientific nonsense.

If gay ect was not a social construct (just as "ADHD" is the new term for kids being naturally kids and active), whole societies, not least old greek ones such as Sparta, would not be "gay".

We would not be having married spouses leaving their partners and becoming "gay" too (or vice-versa).

 

Clearly men and women interacting between themselves is as old as humanity while these terms and utterly nonsensical statements are more recent (the whole psychiatry field is a scam, under big pharma influence, for instance).

 

So what exactely, scientifically being gay means (outside self-serving pseudo- studies)?

 

A more fundamental issue is, if any primitive instinct should be gratified and excused, why would be cannibalism under consent (yes, there are real cases), incest or any other one be prohibited then under "public morality"?

 

Is even homosexual practice medically safe (clearly, it is extremely risky) or sound in providing children with stable family relationships, arguably their single most important right in any ideological system?

 

If gayness is not a clear cut, scientific term, (eg such as being born with sickle cell or others genetic conditions), and its practice is so medically unsafe, yet not propitious to optimal family structure, why should it be not discouraged instead of being lobbied for?

Oh you seem to know more about science than those who do nothing else for living but science. Very clever man indeed:o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
NGONGE   

Reeyo;964815 wrote:
It is truly a deterioration of the human. If we have redefined 'marriage', a union between man and woman for procreating to- same-sex and then we have lost greatly. Xin is not being dramatic but stating a fact.

 

Those of you that believe this is a 'white' 'gaalo' problem. Look at you location and then look at the value system your children are growing up in.

We redefined marraige? Xiin is stating a fact? I don't think you should be the judge on what is "dramatic" after such a start.

 

As for what the gaalo do, well unless you plan to bring up your kids as gaalo themselves none of these "value systems" will matter.

 

Talk sense, people. Talk sense. Baritaad nago waalaysan "Toronto baan jooga, cadha i haysa, kaneesad ba nala ag dhisay".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
N.O.R.F   

The culminated of a concerted campaign over 30 years. Slowly slowly we saw them in comedy shows and movies as funny 'likeable' characters setting up one platform after another where it is seen as perfectly normal by many in the west today. Bringing in such laws was only a matter of time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Abu-Salman;964897 wrote:
We need to define very precisely the term "gay" before stating "people are born gay" and other unscientific nonsense.

If gay ect was not a social construct (just as "ADHD" is the new term for kids being naturally kids and active), whole societies, not least old greek ones such as Sparta, would not be "gay".

We would not be having married spouses leaving their partners and becoming "gay" too (or vice-versa).

 

Clearly men and women interacting between themselves is as old as humanity while these terms and utterly nonsensical statements are more recent (the whole psychiatry field is a scam, under big pharma influence, for instance).

 

So what exactely, scientifically being gay means (outside self-serving pseudo- studies)?

 

A more fundamental issue is, if any primitive instinct should be gratified and excused, why would be cannibalism under consent (yes, there are real cases), incest or any other one be prohibited then under "public morality"?

 

Is even homosexual practice medically safe (clearly, it is extremely risky) or sound in providing children with stable family relationships, arguably their single most important right in any ideological system?

 

If gayness is not a clear cut, scientific term, (eg such as being born with sickle cell or others genetic conditions), and its practice is so medically unsafe, yet not propitious to optimal family structure, why should it be not discouraged instead of being lobbied for?

listen athi you live in Saudi Arabia right. If that is the case, just stop and focus on the fact that women in 2013 are not allowed to drive in your country. your like a baby signing up as a long distance running.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Marksman   

If homosexuality is not something people are born with, is it then a conscious choice? I find the latter difficult to believe. Because that would imply that straight people also take the decision to be straight some time in their life.

 

I see it as human development. And if something occurs in nature, it is therefore automatically natural. The difference is to accept homosexual acts versus homosexuality itself. Homosexuality isn't going nowhere and people shouldn't be all emotional about it.

 

I'm not interested in pseudo science based on religion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tallaabo   

N.O.R.F;964927 wrote:
Lol. He doesn't live in Saudi. Can you address his points now?

Well there are no points to address here. The guy just regurgitated the discredited non-sense peddled by the Christian evangelicals and the fanatical Muslim pseudo-scientists. The article in the link talks about the real science if you want to know it.

 

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14146-gay-brains-structured-like-those-of-the-opposite-sex.html#.Uc2ovjFwbIU

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

N.O.R.F;964927 wrote:
Lol. He doesn't live in Saudi. Can you address his points now?

lol, are you sure, hundred percent, my radar is pointing Not only Saudi but specifically Jidda area.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't understand what all this brouhaha is all about... More homosexuals means more women for us real men, eh?:D

 

But jokes aside, the supreme court basically brought an end to DOMA leaving the states to decide whether or not they should institutionalize gay marriage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tallaabo   

Tillamook;964935 wrote:
I don't understand what all this brouhaha is all about...
Gay marriage will leave more women for us real men, eh?:
D

That is not the case. You will still have to compete with the lesbians and the bi-sexual guys for every chick:p

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tallaabo   

Tillamook;964938 wrote:
^

It seems you know a tad bit much about the working conditions at Camp Qoomul Luud.

 

No offense, but why is that?

Only those in deep coma do not know a thing or two about homosexuality

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this