Aha! Good move.

Is ilaaliya http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7516551.stm

JB, I thought in lagu af dhuubey saxib....wlc back

Much a do about nowt!

Will listen later IA

OK, I suppose I will have to play the one quote at a time game if it makes things easier for you to understand. By now it is obvious you’re pissing against the wind and your only fight back is with the usual reliance on ‘wit’ to get you through. And This is what? the can-you-answer-my-question debate? Yes I'd really be slow in the up-take if i thought an unknowable Deity 'created' Human-beeings as is, by blowing life into a piece of mud ( poooooooof ) But you’re only too willing to believe that you descended from Apes You're not only missing alot,but displaying a poverity in rational thinking. Since when asking for evidence became an excuse, a 'sorry' one at that?. Do you accept everything at face-value or you're just making an exception when it comes to all 'creators', Gods, or you just do it for this special God? As for questioning evolution, its about time i let you in on this little secret, There is no alternative to evolution as history that withstands critical examination. The idea of ( pooooof ) was too frail long before man got enlighted. An example of running around in circles if ever there was one. You accept the evolution theory because: a) it’s the only plausible theory b) there is no alternative c) the man was ‘enlightened’ (lets be honest here, the man just ran out of ideas!) The evolution theory does not withstand critical examination. I would be interested in how it does though Johnny. Can you provide this? Yours seems to be advocating for one thing and then forgets what it was advocating for in the first place! Are you implying that evolutionary theory is not scientific? Do you 'know' what a Scientific theory is? Do you understand what 'theory' means in the world Science? To judge your question,i don't think you do. Normally, laymen think of 'theory' as an imperfect truth, in a line of thinking where 'theory' is part of a hierarchy of confidence that runs down a hill,it goes from 'fact' to 'theory' to 'hypothesis',fact beeing absolute truth,'theory' beeing half-or-less truth and hypothesis beeing least truth. The wonderful thing about Science is it's progressive,the Data in the world is our fact and the Scientific Theories are our structures of ideas that explain and interpret that fact, and most importantly 'fact' in Science means,only confirmed to such a degree that it would be perverse to withhold provisional consent. I suppose finding a human skull and an ape’s jaw, putting them together and calling it science makes some people believe such theories. When it comes to science JB, unfortunately for the Atheists, it is AGAINST the evolution theory. An easy question would be why aren’t we still ‘evolving’? Can you answer that? The evidence doesn’t stack up JB. I’m just wondering why you’re prepared to believe it with all the chinks in its armour as blatant as daylight in the Sahara! I’m sure you’re aware of the evidence against it and it shall be interesting how you defend it Now that we've covered the 'theory', 'fact' in Science, can i savely assume that you got it? Are you seriously suggesting that there is no difference between the two in science? I was always under the impression that once something is ‘proved’ it becomes fact. Darwin’s theory has not been ‘proved’ correct. In fact the opposite has been occurring for the past many years JB. I’ll leave with a bit of homework. Disappoint me not. "There is no evidence in the fossil record of one kind of creature becoming another kind. No transitional links or intermediate forms between various kinds of creatures have ever been found." For example, "the evolutionist claims that it took perhaps fifty million years for a fish to evolve into an amphibian. But, again, there are no transitional forms. For example, not a single fossil with part fins...part feet has been found. And this is true between every major plant and animal kind." Ranganathan, B.G. Origins?, Carlisle, PA: The Banner of Truth Trust, 1988. Page 19 and this,,, Darwin stated, "Why, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms? Why is not all nature in confusion instead of the species being, as we see them, well defined?" Johnson, Phillip. Darwin on Trial, Washington, D.C.: Regnery Gateway, 1991. Page 46 and this Because of the lack of evidence for gradual evolution in the fossil record, more and more evolutionists are adopting a new theory of evolution known as macroevolution. The theory of macroevolution teaches that animals and plants changed suddenly from one kind to another without going through any gradual or transitional process. Now we know where the merry dance routine came from

very sad

^^ An early eid mabruuk then

Originally posted by Brofessor_Geeljire: At 5.30pm there will be a Islamic talk. And at 6.00pm people can mingle, greet, give presents and have shisha, cakes and snacks I would normally make a snide comment here Ibti, gald you enjoyed it and was home in time for Dr Who

Not so fast Johnny. Your urgency to end this is understandable but its time to put Atheism and it’s fallacies under the spotlight. I asked the question to highlight the bankruptcy of the whole atheist argument about creation. You believe that there is no creator with the sorry excuse of there being no evidence (or not enough evidence) but then in the same breath state that you believe in human evolution without being prepared to question it’s short-comings! I’m I missing something here? LoL ‘scientific’ theory, tell me what is ‘scientific’ about it JB It’s well known that there is a severe lack of evidence on human evolution and I’m yet to come across ANY 'evidence' in support of it. It’s the old trick of repeating it over and over again and having it in the school curriculum that got millions thinking along those line. I’m sure JB was ‘enlightened’ in those early days in Sweden. You may want to believe that you’re the descendent of animals if you want to though Why do you ignore the evidence AGAINST evolution JB? Be prepared for more questions In the meantime I'll leave you with the following for you to think about: Many ...believe in evolution for the simple reason that they think science has proven it to be a `fact' and, therefore, it must be accepted... In recent years, a great many people...having finally been persuaded to make a real examination of the problem of evolution, have become convinced of its fallacy and are now convinced anti-evolutionists." -- Henry Morris, former evolutionist. ps the 'introductory presents everything as fact and not theory. Maybe this is hwo they presented to you

Those areas ar 10-15 min drive and taxis in Dubai are cheap when you can find one. A villa in those areas would cost alot more. $60 per year should cover it. Private education depends on the age of the child and what school you want. There are schols in those neighbourhoods. Not sure what the costs are though.

North, I dont know wher you get the idea you implying here, The secessionists should leave the peace loving people of Awdal alone, All they want is One Somalia. that is Not a crime. Leave them alone or free them? Make your mind up saxib.

^^where is that?

Xidigo, Burcaawiyow, Somaliland is still part of Somalia Well Dabshid doen't seem to be aware of that One minute its not and then the next WALLA it is You're stuck between a rock and a hard place The day will come when the likes of you will be singing "Soomaaliyeey toosoo" with a big grin on your face. In the mean time I'll just sit here and complain about lack of development shall I? Somaliland is still part of Somalia How ironic ps don't worry you're not alone

^^You're welcome but $30k a year is not enough for a villa in Dubai. A 2 bed apartment yes even that would have to be on the outskirts. $40k should cover it. Living in Dubai depends on if one drives. If you're going to be based in the DIFC, areas adjacent like Al Mankhool and Al Safa would be ideal (but high rents). Be mindful that DIFC area has alot of buildings and very little parking space so request a parking spot Let me know how it goes and I'll give you a crash course on everything Dubai.

I'm down the supermarket first thing mate :cool:

^^Waa runteede waa nin waalan

Good news. Hope it continues. I will look for good old Somali goat in the aisles :cool:

^^Arab names tend to have religious meanings. Muslims tend to name their kids after people who have made an impact of Islamic history. Thats just something that we should accept. I love Somali names and hope to find unique ones very soon IA.

^Does that mean SL is seperate from Somalia? 19 pages down the line and no one has stated the obvious,,,,,,,,,,,

^^from who?

The Islamic finance market is growing at a rapid pace. I have many Islamic products and will latch onto the National Bonds soon IA.

Mr Me and his anti-Arab ways Me Ibn ......... Al Laas Canoodi?

^

Again, you have understood wrong. I’m not here to tell you who created you and how (that’s not what this thread is about). As I’m ‘Agnostic about Atheism’, I would like for you to expand on your following statement; the only plausible answer is Human-beeings evolved to their current state of beeing from another less-fit state of beeing * what was the less fit state of being? * how did we evolve? * how long did it take? * why is this the only 'plausible' answer? (are you merely opting for this because you have no other 'agreeable' alternative?) ps I'm assuming you can 'rationally' and 'intellectually' explain away the above Don't disappoint now