Sign in to follow this  
Abtigiis

A New Dark Leaf on Faroole's Dour History

Recommended Posts

Somalia define, ''how you ruined the place''

 

who is you, ma aniga baa ila leedahay dagaalada sokeeye baad ka qeyb qaadatay?? bal ii faahfaahi adeer gacaliye

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sax laakin koodooda qaldan way tageeraan isagu qalad ku tagaan shacabka anigu kama hadlayo waxan ka hadlaya siyaasinta , the political leaders of garowe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Somalia   

Xaaji Xunjuf;831759 wrote:
Sax laakin koodooda qaldan way tageeraan isagu qalad ku tagaan shacabka anigu kama hadlayo waxan ka hadlaya siyaasinta , the political leaders of garowe.

Rich from you since you support Siilaanyo, he ruined what you build in 20 years in 2. You won't believe the awkwardness at Somaliland parties today.

 

@Oba hiloowlow I am talking about your leaders, Indhacade, Cismaan Caato, Muuse Suudi, Qanyare, Bootaan Ciise, Omar Finish, Ina Aideed, from 1991 to 2004 those men were the head of the country, so why should I as a Puntlander not say that indeed the ones in the south are the reason why Somalia never had peace, something you sarcastically tried to put across in your previous post. Faroole has every right to speak and should speak.

 

Spoilers were the ones who said "we reject the constitution outright", they hadn't even read it, they never raised a concern, just said "dastuur waa diidney" as they used to say "dowlad waa diidney" and wanting back to their old habitat of moryaanimo. Here you have Faroole rejecting articles after he actually read it, he actually understood what it meant, do you believe Indhacade read the constitution?

 

And after Faroole rejected the articles the new angle by the spoilers is 'why is Faroole rejecting it?' war maxaa kaa galay niyahow DANTAADA FIIRSO, waa cajiib wallahi.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And after Faroole rejected the articles the new angle by the spoilers is 'why is Faroole rejecting it?' war maxaa kaa galay niyahow DANTAADA FIIRSO, waa cajiib wallahi.

 

What is wrong with this dantaada fiirso maydan isku dan ahayn maydan hal dastuur wada lahayn wamaxay dantada fiirso

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Somalia   

oba hiloowlow;831762 wrote:
first u said you ruined the country hadana ur leaders inteen ku raaca

Waxaa ii raacdaa the AU headquarters in Addis Ababa, the ones that rule your street.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Somalia   

Xaaji Xunjuf;831763 wrote:
And after Faroole rejected the articles the new angle by the spoilers is 'why is Faroole rejecting it?' war maxaa kaa galay niyahow DANTAADA FIIRSO, waa cajiib wallahi.

 

What is wrong with this dantaada fiirso maydan isku dan ahayn maydan hal dastuur wada lahayn wamaxay dantada fiirso

Of course isku dan manahin, some want federalism, one wants a central government that was the root cause of the civil war in the first place and the loudest voices don't know what they want.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Somalia   

oba hiloowlow;831767 wrote:
bes bes adeer sheekada meeshaas ha ku ekaato,

Ok, aniga runta bas baan kuu sheegey, labaatan sano baa naga daba hadleesin, war adiga shaqeeso oo dastuurka fiirso, adiga siyaasadaa sidee bii kuu kordeesaa, qodobkaan mi ii fiicanyahay, kan hala iga badeelo markii aad sheegi laheed baa Puntland ku sii sugantihiin waan idinka naxay wallahi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mario B   

Somalia;831766 wrote:
Of course isku dan manahin, some want federalism, one wants a central government that was the root cause of the civil war in the first place and the loudest voices don't know what they want.

The route of civil war was a military dictatorship that suspended democratic governance in Somalia, introduced clan nepotism and scientific socialism [ communism lite] that destroyed private enterprise and took us to a war with our neighbour without having diplomatic support from IC. Puntlanders are everyday starting to sound like Somalilanders...pity really. :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Abtigiis   

Lying for your country is a sort of nobility, or so it was considered for a long time in imperial Britain. The Puntland crew in SOL are imitating this antiquated philosophy but their amateurish approach easily gives clan colour and identity to their political pronouncements. They are all into this habit of mistaking provable lies for propaganda. But Xinnfanin, the TB Joshua of Somalia, with endless prophecies, showcases extra diligence and sophistry in his defence of the devil in the land of the Punt.

 

His false prophecy of what will happen in Istanbul, itself*an evident credo to the intention of this pious propagandist, is not coming because he is not aware that the Istanbul conference has nothing to do with the constitutional process or ending transition. Indeed, unless he is ill-informed or misinformed by his sources, he would know that istanbul is about economic reconstruction plans for Somalia post-transition. It is a result of envious UN and Western Donors gate-crushing into what they perceived to be parallel processes by the Turks and muslim countries trying to stake a firm hold in a stable somalia. Istanbul is about competing foreign interests, and to a little degree about economic reconstruction of Somalia. Rival somali politicians will not be there to deliberate on clauses of their nation's constitution. Which is why I finally share Haatu's charge that Xinnfanin has long abandoned intellectual responsibility and is now a certifiable clan propagandist.

 

His sanitizing remarks on Faroole and Ethiopia's political tryst in Addis is irresponsible when you consider the fact that one of the articles Puntland opposes in the constitution is that "any future president must relinquish his foreign citizenship before starting ruling the country". What is wrong with this? Where else in this world does this formality invoke rebuke? And even if some like Faroole, with an Australian passport, have issues, is it Addis or Mogadishu where this has to be raised and agreed on?!

 

Is this act of discussing somalia's national constitution in foreign lands less of an infringement on national sovereignty than the military interventions of neighbouring countries into border towns? An intervention which Xinn was loudly denouncing few moons ago!! The more relevant question is, if he is prepared to give the benefit of the doubt to Faroole's opposition to few clauses of the constitution, why hasn't he granted the same benefit to the whole commuities and more than 200 parliamentarians who oppose a big chunk of the constitution? Surely, they can also highlight few clauses they do not like if pushed further!

 

 

P.S i now believe iphones are for the young. Oday indhihii daaleen looguma tala galin. Taking ages to type one word. but then showing off gadgets is one of the new tricks to look a modern man and attract young girls. It poses a dilemma for me. :D :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mario B   

Abtigiis;831882 wrote:
... he would know that istanbul is about economic reconstruction plans for Somalia post-transition....

That's makes it laughable Somalilands rejection of Istanbul conference given they never refuse to extend their arms whenever aid and economic aid is concerned. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this