Five kusbans....looool Now that's orgy lazy

^^^LooooooL Zu....Duq Kaastaro is gonna beat to that. N I don't think Gabadhaha inee dan u gaysay. What does Imam doing da Nikaax says about it. Redse....Xaan iri duqa

I used to watch him during my days in Pakistan, superb bastmen. From I what understand, Saeed Anwar introduced Islam to him, and the two actualy resemble each when sporting that big gar.

Shaikh Sharif captured today Source Pls

By Hassan Yare BAIDOA, Somalia, Jan 17 (Reuters) - Somalia's parliament on Wednesday ousted powerful speaker Sharif Hassan Sheikh Adan, who split with the president and prime minister late last year over his peace overtures to rival Islamists. "The speaker is out," Somali legislator Ali Basha told Reuters by phone from the parliament in a converted grain warehouse in the provincial town of Baidoa. He said 183 voted against Adan, while eight voted in his favour and one abstained. The ouster of Adan was widely seen as an attempt by the interim government to consolidate power after its troops, backed by Ethiopia's military, ran the Islamists out of strongholds in Mogadishu and most of southern Somalia at the New Year. "They want to send a clear signal to those who supported the Islamic courts that they don't have a place in the present political dispensation. But that may be a mis-calculation," Somali expert Matt Bryden said. President Abdullahi Yusuf's administration is being urged by many to reach out to opponents to ensure peace and stability in the chaotic Horn of Africa nation. Member of parliament Mohamed Isak Fanah, who opposed the motion, said it would foster conflict. "What happened in the parliament today is a new problem for Somalia. Somalia needs a reconciliation process," he said. The speaker, who had close ties to the Mogadishu businessmen who financed the Somalia Islamic Courts Council (SICC), made several attempts to strike peace deals between the government and the Islamist movement when it controlled most of the south. But his manoeuvres incurred the wrath of Yusuf and Prime Minister Ali Mohamed Gedi, who said the power-sharing deal he cut did not have any government authority. Adan's overtures preceded the late December offensive against the Islamists. The speaker, who has not been in parliament for months and was in Brussels on Tuesday to meet EU aid chief Louis Michel, could not be reached for comment. Local media reports said he was in Djibouti, but that could not immediately be confirmed. Ibrahim Adan Hassan, one of 31 members of parliament (MPs) who proposed the no-confidence vote, blamed Adan for rifts in the administration. "The speaker was at the head of the conflict in parliament for the last two years," Hassan said. PEACEKEEPERS WANTED Officials said a new speaker would be appointed in 15 days. Somali sources close to the government said Yusuf's office had also ordered a reshuffle on Wednesday to trim the cabinet. But government spokesman Abdirahman Dinari, speaking by telephone from the capital Mogadishu, dismissed that. "The government is busy disarming Somalia, and MPs are in parliament impeaching the speaker, so those reports are absolutely not true," he told Reuters. Yusuf and Gedi are trying to bring the volatile nation of 10 million to heel after the routing of the Islamists, who have fled to the south near Kenya. Police in Kenya are checking rumours some top Islamists want to surrender at the border. The Somali government wants an African Union (AU) peacekeeping force -- approved by the U.N. Security Council before the war -- in Somalia by the end of the month. Though some momentum seems to be gathering for such a mission, that timetable looks highly optimistic, given that most analysts believe it will take far longer to organise. Ethiopia wants to pull out its soldiers in weeks. In South Africa, Deputy Foreign Minister Aziz Pahad said the continent would be unable to move in quickly to replace Ethiopian troops. "We are overstretched," Pahad said of South Africa, which Gedi has mentioned as a probable contributor. Pahad also criticised a U.S. air raid on suspected al Qaeda targets last week in south Somalia, saying it added "oil to the fires that are burning in Africa and the Middle East". Even if an African force does move into Somalia, it faces a mammoth task to tame a nation which has been in anarchy since the 1991 ouster of a dictator and which defied the best efforts of U.S. and U.N. peacekeepers in the early 1990s. As well as the threat of a guerrilla war from Islamist remnants who are hiding in the south, other security threats include the return of warlords, the prevalence of weapons across the country and long-running clan feuds. (Additional reporting by Bryson Hull, Andrew Cawthorne in Nairobi, Sahal Abdulle in Mogadishu, Tsegaye Tadesse in Addis Ababa, Sarah McGregor in Pretoria) Source: Reuters, Jan 17, 2007

Wednesday, January 17, 2007 MOGADISHU, Somalia (AP) - A top Somali lawmaker closely associated with the recently ousted Islamic movement was voted out as speaker Wednesday by parliament, a move that could undermine reconciliation efforts in the restive country. Deputy Speaker Osman Ilmi Boqore announced that parliament voted to strip Sharif Hassan Sheik Aden of the speaker's position. Lawmakers cited his public criticism of a proposed African peacekeeping mission that parliament had endorsed and his meetings with Islamic movement leaders without authority from parliament. newsinisideBoqore, in proceedings broadcast live on HornAfrik Radio from the parliament's seat in Baidoa, said that only nine of the lawmakers present voted against the motion. Voting in favor were 183 lawmakers — 44 more than required — in the 275-member parliament Aden's actions have been in "total violation of our transitional charter," lawmaker Mohamoud Begos told The Associated Press by phone from Baidoa. It was not clear if Aden was in Somalia. Aden had made several freelance peace initiatives with Somalia's Islamic movement before government forces — with key help from Ethiopian troops — ousted them in December from the capital, Mogadishu, and much of southern Somalia. In Belgium Wednesday, European Union spokesman Amadeu Altafaj Tadio expressed disappointment at the Somali parliament's move against Aden, who held meetings with EU officials in Belgium earlier this week. "We saw him as a someone who could make a bridge with the moderate elements," Altafaj said. "We had encouraged him to go back to Mogadishu to carry out his job and bring together as many political players as possible." Michael E. Ranneberger, the U.S. ambassador to Kenya, told reporters in the Kenyan capital Wednesday before the vote that Aden was "the kind of person who could pull people together." The U.S. encourages dialogue in Somalia, including with a key Islamic leader like Sheik Sharif Sheik Ahmed, who is seen as a moderate, Ranneberger said. "If he (Ahmed) wanted to play a positive role that should be a possibility. He is a recognized moderate," said Ranneberger, whose portfolio includes Somalia. In the past year, Aden has differed with Yusuf and Gedi over the location of the government and whether peacekeepers were needed. According to Somalia's transitional charter, parliament has to vote on all major government decisions before they can be implemented. Neighboring Yemen at one point stepped in to mediate between the president and prime minister and the speaker. On Wednesday, Gedi told parliament that he ruled out peace talks with the Islamic movement and hoped to see the first African peacekeepers in Somalia by month's end. So far only Uganda has committed to contributing troops and few others have shown enthusiasm for a proposed 8,000-strong African mission to bolster the government's attempt to create law and order. A peacekeeping mission could face some violence, something that may deter many countries from committing soldiers. There has been sporadic fighting since the government took over Mogadishu on Dec. 28. Leaders of the Islamic movement have pledged to carry on a guerrilla war as long as Ethiopian troops remain in Somalia. A U.N. peacekeeping operation in Somalia in the 1990s saw clashes between foreign troops and Somali warlords' fighters, including the notorious downings of two U.S. military Black Hawk helicopters in 1993. The U.S. withdrew from Somalia in 1994, and that was followed a year later by the departure of U.N. peacekeepers. Somalia has not had an effective central government since 1991 when warlords overthrew longtime dictator Mohamed Siad Barre and then turned on each other, reducing this Horn of Africa nation to anarchy and clan-based violence. The Yusuf-Gedi government emerged from regional, U.N.-backed talks in 2004 and has since struggled to assert authority. Source: AP, Jan 17, 2007

All cute ones have become Devil's hand holders. She might be able to lease you one though even that could be expensive.

Meesha Buffet Miyaa...Cajiib

Hmmmm..a swimming outfit how about a little qeed (make dat da top), and super Alfalaax.

small eyed and big forehead.. Scene I...The married Arab staring at the UK Rose,thinking to himself " My God, she has just big forehead, on plus side what *bleep* " Scene II......Uk Rose to the Arab, " Why are you staring at me" Arab guy thinking, " Do really have to ask" but says, " You Somali women look so beautiful" to be continued,

LoooooooooooL@Serenity Point...come on, don't chicken out now

NN.....The only reason Ethiopia become interested in "helping" the goverment was to dislodge the UIC who feared it would give the Ethio rebellions a base to train and launch attacks against the Tigray regime. In no way, shape, or form was the Ethios interested in reviving the Somali State. Anyone believing otherwise is either promoting the self-interest or simply being delusional.

NN.....The only reason Ethiopia become interested in "helping" the goverment was to dislodge the UIC who feared it would give the Ethio rebellions a base to train and launch attacks against the Tigray regime. In no way, shape, or form was the Ethios interested in reviving the Somali State. Anyone believing otherwise is either promoting the self-interest or simply being delusional.

Eraygii la mamnuucay* will always be *Eraygii lamamnuucay* . LooooooooooL We shall miss you...Abu Paragon

Mohamed Hebaan 16 Jan, 2007 The typical Somali warlord is an ambitious man who uses his clan connections as a stepping stone to curve up a fiefdom, supposedly, to protect or advance clan interests. But, in reality, a warlord is preoccupied only with self-enrichment and self-aggrandizement, and, therefore, in the end becomes menace on his own clansmen. The best known Somali warlords were Mohamed Farah Aidid, Abdulahi Yusuf, and the Mogadishu warlords, all of whom eventually tormented and terrorized their own clansmen. Parallel to the usual warlords are the Pen-warlords. This group, the pen-warlords, exists in all of Somali regions, but they are mainly found in large numbers on the three main regions of the country: the south, especially Mogadishu, Puntland and Somaliland. Pen-warlords rise and fall with the causes and warlords they support or act as their mouth piece. During the rise of Aidid and Mogadishu warlords, some Mogadishu pen-warlords came to prominence primarily to justify the killing of innocent Somalis whose only crime was belonging to wrong clans. And in fact one such pen-warlord actually published a book in which he claimed, among other things, if my memory service me well, that Sayid Mohamed Abdulle Hassan’s statue was sacked because it represented as symbol of oppression, for his clansmen. Abdi-Qani Hirad, a prominent contributor to both soc.culture.Somalia and the SAPD, embarrassed the said pen-warlord by asking“What about the statues of Dhagah-tour and Hawo Tako? What about the scrapping of Mogadishu’s water pipes and electricity polls?” Since the star of Mogadishu warlords declined and is now finished completely, the Mogadishu pen-warlords are also in the dust-pin of history. Somaliland pen-warlords are essentially the secession pen-warlords, and they have been around for more than a decade, or perhaps since the declaration of the secession. From day one, this group built its craft on two components: a) Scare tactics and b) vilification. On the first, they directed at the people of Somaliland, and on the latter directed at southern Somalia, or perhaps at the rest of Somalis. But since scare tactic and hatred can never become a vision or achieve progress, Somaliland pen-warlords are stalled in the first square of their game! True, they bought some pen-mercenaries here and there such as the awfully superficial Dr. Pham, but, in the grand scheme of things, the plot never catched on! And now their sacred scheme of perpetual vilification of southern Somalia is to be undone, because the people of Somaliland are now, thankfully, tired of these ridiculous tactics. Therefore it appears the end is not far of for the secession pen-warlords. The third pen-warlords are the supporters of TFG and particularly the supporters of Abdulahi Yusuf. This is the group that I call ‘the new breed of pen-warlords’, for out of the woods they came, and now they are everywhere! Since this group insists that the TFG is here for the good of the Somali people, and Ethiopia came just to help the TFG, I will pose to them this direct question: If Ethiopia invaded Somalia to help us and support the TFG, why on earth it didn’t invade Mogadishu in the almost two years the TFG was desperate for help, and was holed up in Jowhar and Baydhaba and practically terrorized by Mogadishu warlords? The reason Ethiopia didn’t invade Mogadishu when the warlords were in control and were humiliating the government is that by undermining the TFG and by aborting all the reconciliation efforts, the Mogadishu warlords were, themselves, doing Ethiopia’s dirty work. Therefore Ethiopia need not worry about Somalia! It was only when the hated warlords were crushed and kicked out and peace and stability restored, and the call of brotherhood and reconciliation spread from Mogadishu all the way to Borama and beyond, that Ethiopia started worrying, hatched its plans, and invaded the country! In other words, when we, Somalis, tear ourselves apart, Ethiopia is content to give money and weapons to whoever is doing the ACT of tearing the Somalis apart! However when we regain our senses, and come together and settle our differences, and try to move forward, Ethiopia, seeing her proxies failed and no longer up to the job, will decisively roll in and do the ACT of tearing the Somalis apart, herself. As it just did. It is that Ethiopia which through its history, through its actions and through its wicked designs has shown, time and again, to be the worst and the eternal enemy of the Somali people that has been portrayed, unconvincingly, as our sole sister and new savior! These new pen-warlords have the misfortune and in fact the shame on two critical points: 1— Those whom they chose to oppose and they are out to destroy are not the usual run of the mill Somali warlords, obsessed with self-enrichment and thievery, but the best, the most competent and the most inspiring leadership the Somali people have seen in many years and decades! 2— By opposing the UIC, the only patriotic front, that unlike all others stood up to Ethiopia, these new pen warlords have, on the one hand, helped to deprive the Somali people a capable leadership that would have moved the country forward, and on the other hand, the pen warlords have found themselves in the unenviable position of ending up in bed with Ethiopia, their people’s and their nation’s worst enemy! Against the UIC, two specific charges were making the rounds, and they are: a—The UIC and its leaders are the old warlords with religious clothes, and they can never be trusted. b—The UIC leadership is entirely made up of one clan, and does not represent the interests of all Somalis. These two charges however do not stand to critical scrutiny. On the first charge of the UIC being the old warlords is often made by the new pen warlords, and to them I say: To take under your wings the real warlords and the true “umulo dooxs” such as Abdi Qaybdid, Hussein Aidid, Sudi Yalahow, Qanyare and the rest of the Mogadishu gangs, who openly murdered innocent Somali men, women and children for simply belonging to wrong clans, and the same time point the finger at Sheikh Hassan Dahir Aways, and Sheikh Sharif, whom no one ever accused of killing a Somali person for clanist reasons, reeks of your hypocrisy and dishonesty! About the second charge, or the accusation that nearly all the leadership of the UIC belongs to one clan is true! But the charge itself is missing the point. The problem with the Somali leadership was never which clan they belonged to, but what divisive and destructive policies they pursued. So the appropriate question for us Somalis is not which clan our leaders belong to, (since we will never find leaders who don’t belong to some clan or another) but what have our leaders achieved during their leadership? And in that department, the achievements of the UIC and its leaders have been phenomenal, for they have surpassed all and everyone’s expectations! Had the UIC existed, say, for ten years, and deliberately denied and prevented the leaders from other clans to hold the top ranks of the movement, this accusation would have made sense and would have been damaging. But how long did the UIC exist? Not even one year, but just six months! And even in that short period, the UIC leaders have demonstrated how truly inclusive they were! Besides, it was not really unusual that nearly all UIC belonged to one clan. Throughout history, in every society and wherever a reform or a revolutionary movement occurred, those who fill the top ranks of the movement or the revolution were always determined by the time and by the LOCALE from which the movement or the revolution started rolling! In our own Somali history the parallel between the UIC and the Darawish Movement is so compelling and remarkable. For instance, the entire leadership of the Darawish Movement, not just the Sayid, but all the top ranks, and all the commanders of the Darawish forces from Ismail Mire to Abshir Dhorre were all from one clan!! Does that fact diminish the significance of the Darawish Movement or its glorious role in Somali history? Not at all! The same is true for the UIC and its leadership. The views of the new pen warlords come in varieties and different titles, but they have one common theme: Let us forget what happened and support the TFG…The interest of the Somalis lies in supporting the TFG….The best way to get rid of the Ethiopia’s occupation is to support the TFG (I read someone making this last claim in Somali language!) The problem with these assertions and pleadings by the new pen warlords is that their logic seems to be intended for children, rather than for grown up and thinking people. First, you don’t help the enemy to invade the country and kill thousands of its people, and then pretend as though nothing happened. It is not that easy! Second, how can a corrupt and Ethiopia imposed regime that reached Mogadishu through Ethiopian tanks, and over the bodies of thousands of dead Somalis, be beneficial to Somalia? It will never be! In conclusion, without a doubt, of all the Somali pen-warlords, this new breed is, by far, the most pitiful! While the Ethiopian tanks were mowing down the UIC men on the ground, and the Ethiopian fighter jets were mercilessly bombing them from the air, these new pen-warlords started falling over themselves to finish off their brother who was down and History will record this, and the Somali people will never forget it! That is the reason why the new pen warlord’s apologies for Ethiopia and their smear against the UIC are so repulsive and nauseating! Ugu dambayn, adduunku wuu is badali, oo Ethiopia waa la jabin!(mark my words!) Ee ragoow wax ha lays kula hadho! Mohamed Hebaan Email:mohamed19456@hotmail.com Source: wardheernews.com

Sure CG. Here is da source. web page

NEW YORK -- In his memorable, 1961 farewell speech, U.S. President Dwight Eisenhower warned Americans to avoid foreign entanglements and beware the growing power of the military-industrial complex. It was sharply ironic to see American air strikes being launched this week from the decks of the mighty attack carrier USS Eisenhower against the remote East African nation of Somalia. "The U.S. has opened a fourth front in the war on terrorism," trumpeted the Pentagon, as if it did not have enough failing wars on its hands. U.S. warplanes and special forces attacked Somalia from the sea and from the U.S. base at Djibouti. Other U.S. units deployed on the Kenya-Somalia border. Much of Somalia is already occupied by Ethiopia's powerful, U.S.-financed army. Ethiopia invaded defenseless Somalia, with Washington's blessing, under cover of the Christmas holiday. But was Somalia really a "hotbed of terrorism" as Washington claimed? The U.S.-Ethiopian invasion of Somalia was sparked by last fall's defeat of corrupt Somali warlords armed and financed by the CIA. They had kept Somalia in turmoil and near anarchy for 15 years. Last year, a group of Muslim jurists and notables, the Union of Islamic Courts, managed to defeat the warlords and impose law and order on chaotic Somalia. The conservative Islamic Courts were sympathetic to pan-Muslim causes. But they were not involved in anti-American jihadist movements and had no identifiable links, as Washington loudly claimed, to al-Qaida. Four or five African suspects on the 1998 bombing of U.S. Embassies in East Africa may have been in Somalia, but going to war against a sovereign nation to try to assassinate or capture a handful of suspects (some reportedly escaped) is like using a nuclear weapon to kill a gnat and is sure to generate more anti-U.S. violence. But in line with increasing militarization of U.S. foreign policy, the Pentagon's new golden-haired boys, Special Operations Command, pushed aside the humiliated CIA and the feckless State Department and vowed to "drain the Islamic swamp" in Somalia. Thus begins U.S.President George W. Bush's fourth war against the Muslim world. He failed dismally to capture Osama bin Laden, conquer Iraq, or pacify Afghanistan. Dirt-poor, defenceless Somalia is Bush's last stab at glory. Once again, the administration is recklessly charging into a thicket of tribal politics in a remote nation it knows nothing about. U.S. policy in Somalia is being driven by rabid neocons seeking jihad against the entire Muslim world, by gung-ho, know-nothing generals, and self-serving advice from ally Ethiopia. Eritrea's 1993 secession took away Ethiopia's natural access to the sea, leaving it landlocked. Ethiopia's prime goal in Somalia is seizing one or more deep-water ports, turning Somalia into a protectorate, and crushing any Islamic movements that might inflame its own voiceless Muslims. America's attack on Somalia recalls Afghanistan. The U.S. is again blundering into ancient clan and tribal conflicts, using foreign troops and local mercenaries to defend a hated puppet regime without any popular support. Unfortunately, the word "Islamic" triggers murderous, knee jerk reactions by Washington's war party and the Pentagon's dimmer generals. The only good Muslim is a dead Muslim. As U.S. soldiers once said in that earlier counter-terrorism success, Vietnam, "Kill 'em all, let God sort 'em out." Like Afghanistan, Somalia was easy to invade, but may prove very difficult to rule or eventually leave. The invading Ethiopians, blood foes of Somalis, were not greeted with flowers, as U.S. neocons again promised. Somalis saw the U.S. and Ethiopians as invaders, and the now scattered Islamic Courts militias as their best hope for stability and normalcy. The White House is using puny Somalia as a straw man to be set up and knocked down. "War president" Bush desperately needs a victory in his bungled "war on terror." After three defeats, a fake victory over a fake Islamic threat in obscure Somalia is just the kind of jolly news Bush & Co. hopes will cheer gloomy Americans and divert attention from the disaster in Iraq.

She is gonna adopt your kid Aaliyah...only ugly ones

Birth is like horror porn. Who wants to see a kid coming out there.

^^^I like their steamed rice...very healthy, and yummy Kobe beef.

CG..Yaasiin Cusmaan...I believe it was across from the Tomb of the unknown soldier, and I remember there was India/Paki school right behind it. The Fiisha daritoorka was woman. I can't remember her name. I was Ciyaal Galabalay..dhar Jaale But there were other schools closer to Fiat like Sakhawaadin, and Bartamaha.

Bar Fiat...wasn't near isgooska Fiat near da school, I quite remember da name, and I believe there was also church nearby .

Lily-The stories seem to celebrate the deceptive ways of the Dawaco. If you read all them, whether it is Dawaco vs Yaxaas, Maroodi, Dhurwaa, ect, the Dawaco suffers no consequences for its actions. The only time it acts against its nature is when it comes to the Libaax, and the only reason it does is coz it knows "Ishii Dhurwaa tii ku dhacday". So to me, this endorses Khayaano and Tuugnimo. And any child listening to these stories will come away from the same feeling. And then there is generalisation of the Doqonimo regarding other members of reer Dugaag. Iam reading a little bit too much into this, but it reminds how Somalis generalise each other like Reer Hebel saan lagu Yaqaan or what have you.

Hanging of Saddam's aides filmed Barzan Ibrahim Iraqi officials said Barzan's beheading was an accident Iraqi government officials have shown journalists video of the hanging of two of Saddam Hussein's aides, during which one of the men was decapitated. The film shows Barzan Ibrahim - Saddam Hussein's half-brother - and Awad Hamed al-Bandar hanged side-by-side. Barzan, former intelligence chief, and al-Bandar, former head of Iraq's Revolutionary Court, were convicted over the killing of 148 Shias in 1982. The BBC's Andrew North in Baghdad says the video first shows both men being prepared for execution standing next to each other. They were both dressed in orange boiler suits. Executioners in balaclavas placed hoods round both men's heads, then the noose. A short while later the footage, which is silent, shows both men fall. Almost immediately the rope that was round Barzan's neck flicks upwards, the body dropping below. The cameraman then shows the pit below and a headless body, bloodied at the neck and what officials say was Barzan's head still covered by a hood. Al-Bandar's body was still hanging above, said one official who was present at the execution. Our correspondent says officials say they are not planning to release the footage publicly. Both men's bodies are reported to have been flown to Saddam Hussein's home town of Tikrit, 180 km (110 miles) north of Baghdad, for burial. 'No taunts' Witnesses said Barzan and al-Bandar were shaking with fear as they approached the gallows. One of those present, public prosecutor Jaafar al-Moussawi, told the BBC that when the trap door opened, he could only see Barzan's rope dangling. Executed judge's case Obituary: Barzan al-Tikriti "I thought the convict Barzan Ibrahim al-Tikriti had escaped the noose. I shouted that he's escaped the noose, go down and look for him. I went down a few steps ahead of the others to see: I found out that his head had separated from his body." The hangings took place at 0300 (0000 GMT), apparently in the same building in north Baghdad where Saddam Hussein was put to death on 30 December. The manner of the former Iraqi leader's execution drew international criticism after unofficial mobile phone footage showing him being taunted and insulted in his final moments was released. Government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh said there were no such scenes at the hanging of his aides. Mixed reaction The BBC's world affairs correspondent Mike Wooldridge says reaction in Baghdad to Barzan and al-Bandar's executions has been mixed. He says residents of Baghdad's largest Shia district, Sadr City, have celebrated the latest hangings, especially Barzan's. But other Baghdad residents have said the executions have nothing to do with the problems Iraqis face every day, our correspondent adds. In the Shia holy city of Najaf, residents beat drums and marched in the streets at news of the executions. Speaking on a visit to Egypt, US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said while the executions were an Iraqi process, "we were disappointed there was not greater dignity given to the accused under these circumstances". The UK prime minister's spokesman said it was "clearly wrong" if the executions had not been carried out in a dignified way. Others called for the Iraqi authorities to end further executions and focus on national reconciliation

What's point of having good looking patner if both of you have to ignore each other in public. I say hell with the Somali thing, hold on him like any another accessory. Do you really care if you have cute kids. Cute or not as parent, we will have to like them anyway.