JB, u kaadi u kaadi. Ma bosishan baad heshay? La taliye? Agaasime? Wasiir? Nuune, the ladies are the clever ones. There is never any change at the desk so if you have $50 or $100 chances are you will have to fight for your change. Ng, I have about 6k left. Ka ugu qaylo weyn when we board baa iska leh

They have done quite a bit wouldn't you say?

You and your weird encouters. Ana kuwa madaarkaa have been trying to work out siday ii shaxaadi lahaayeen. 3 of them so far with excuses of let me check your ticket, abti baan ku ahay iyo the plane is late so lets go for lunch

Morning from Berbera airport

Interesting. The illnesses in our qurbo communies could be due to, mainly, an inactive lifestyle (I'm talking about the older folks here). Poor diet of rice and meat, too much tea, too much sitting around and a lack of sunshine could all be reasons. Back home you will see elderly folk of 80s+ who are active and still running around. Genetics and lifestyle.

A female voice is needed dheh

Just glad they wont win it again. Stats mean nothing if you only get 5 out of 22 shots on target.

I'm a qurbojoog get me out of here!

Chelsea did what they needed to do. Well done. Now win the thing.

^ I was just trying to scare you

Dacarbudhug? Don't eat anything from there......

Ninkii Ngonge ya ka war haya?

Guys, instead of pictures and videos why don't you have a criteria? Try: 1. Roads 2. Electricity 3. Airport 4. Water supply 5. Commercial activity 6. Reported crime 7. Construction activity 8. Retail space 9. Hotel rooms 10. etc etc Naga daaya

Hmmm, struggling to be accepted by his own community? Flavour of the month Cabdiyaashu

He has that special talent of scoring goals and being a poacher.

What a game last night. Real got it spot on.

Good player but not the finished article yet. Good game.

^lol He was probably told scare stories before he left. Waxa la yidhi he calmed down again when he got to Shiekh

Myself and Ngonge saw Alpha the day before he was to visit Burco. He was edgy and kept looking over his shoulder before mentioning he was due to visit the city the following day He decided to write the above before leaving his comfort zone. Dhaqan celiskii la sheegi jiray weeye. Alpha, we had a bunch of guys from DFID and UNDP with us last night. They stated quite the opposite. They had a quick and reliable internet connection for a start, they were not worried about their cars being messed with and they had access to water anytime of the day Now, ignore politics and give us your real take badowyahow Ps the wadaads here have done a good job on the qaad front

Congratulations and all the best Alpha. Enjoy the shin dig at Maansoor.

Alpha, no its not. I noticed the roads are bettter and its less qurbojoog lol. Where did you go?

^I know. I just want to, in my non-scholarly way, highlight just how much they bend, skew and jump when actually confronted about their beliefs. Can someone who doesn't know what he is rejecting be taken seriously? Johnny B;820005 wrote: Experience tells me that we've been here before , namely where you agree with me that disbelieving in a claim that lacks evidence is all-right , but at the same breath demand it's negation too to be proved with evidence,otherwise the negation itself must be disregarded or disbelieved. Now, if you pay attention, I'd like to thread the ground so hang on here . Case 1: A states that a Deity by the name Akea rules the universe. - -> A Belief. B states that another Deity by the name Eingana rules the Universe. --> Another Belief. Here disbelieving in Akea's rule of the Universe due to lack of evidence doesn't per automatic make belief in Eingana's rule of the Universe more right/correct, it simply doesn't follow. An evidence for Einganas rule of the Universe is equally demandable. case 2: A states that a Deity by the name Akea rules the universe. - -> A Belief. B states that Akea's rule of the universe lacks evidence. - -> A Disbelief. Here disbelieving in Akea's rule of the Universe due to lack of evidence is already the position of B. Now demanding an evidence for an evidence that Akea's rule of the Universe lacks evidence is simply wrong. B is the negation of A , and as long as there is no evidence for A , B remains necessarily true. So B is an Agnostic

Johnny boy, its one thing to disbelieve in a claim due to, as you say, a lack of evidence but quite another to believe in the opposite of that claim without any evidence Sound reasoning I'm sure

^can we do away with quotes from others and concentrate on the topic ie the verses given by Maadeey? Do you disagree with his explainations? If so, why? etc etc