^LooooooooooooL...that was fast

^Smile at the next guy you see.And you will be amused for awhile

Is it 'See Tahay' then? Don't tell Lazy P.S. I think I'm better than Ibti and CL.

^Say Tahay

Looks like we get another black governor web page Flanked by his wife, he once again apologised for what he called his unacceptable behaviour. I feel bad for this lady,and their daughters

^If you only caught with your hand in the cookie jar. Jimcaale...Every guy is womaniser. It is just matter of who get the guts and how excited you get,but if there is any fault with Spitzer, he is ambitious for his own and burn too many bridges. P.S. Watever happen to having a mistress.

^Amiin

^Waad jirantahay get help!!! LooooooooooL@Jim

Originally posted by Jimcaale: lol@Faarax. Qarxis.com quote: Che, adeer adiguna goormaa kitaabka kuugu danbayse? "Is it allowed diiniyan" ma wax da'aada dadka la waydiiyo baa? Jimcaale, clearly you haven't followed the conversation starting with the article itself. That edit button cancels any replies. LoooooooooooooooL...War Horn, it was simple yes or no answer. Spooning with your uncle's widow is disturbing, atleast to me.

^He didn't say anything about Diinta allowing it unless he is equating the Somali culture with Diinta which I believe he is not.

Forget culture, is it allowed Diiniyan?

Originally posted by Northerner: Simple question would be why not? @ Che Anything that puts our Prophet ahead of God and the faith mounts to idol worship. I understand our Prophet is revered figure in Islam, but anything about him should be within the context of Islamic teachings and history. It is Islam that defines the Prophet's very life and legacy, not the other way round.Any good Islamic scholar will tell you to put the faith before the Man who preached It. LoooooooooL@Aaliyah...like the great libraries of Andulasia where Europeans came to study. The something like that would make sense.

It is not good idea to have an institution where the Prophet is centre and everything about the religion serves the tourist in ancillary capicity. The emphasis should on the faith itself,and not the Man who preached It. Anything about the Prophet (PHUB) should be within the context of Islamic faith and history. The way this museum is setup, it sounds like Islam emanated from the Prophet (PBUH). Reread that P.S. If i'm not mistaken the overall goal here is to educate non-Muslims and perhaps Muslims about Islam, right?

^Arab Hater,Anti-Semite

c) Somalis should not be criticising Arab leaders who take care of their people (whatever their short-coming). This one pass by me. What does this have to do with anything.Maybe you shouldn't criticise us for criticising Arab leaders which we haven't criticise.Anyhow, I can understand museum about the Islamic civilisations and the contributions of the Muslims to the world. It is not good idea to have an institution where the Prophet is centre and everything about the religion serves the tourist in ancillary capicity. The emphasis should on the faith itself,and not the Man who preached It. Anything about the Prophet (PHUB) should be within the context of Islamic faith and history. The way this museum is setup, it sounds like Islam emanated from the Prophet (PBUH).

^That's cheap shot then. Surely, you could up with better argument in defense of this project rather politicizing with you are anti-Arab mantra.

There seems to be a hint of Anti Arab sentiment in here. Was that for me or you just throw in there to give your argument little more weight. P.S. Better option would have an Islamic museum dedicated to the achievement whether be art, science,architecture,and history of the past Islamic civilisations. Of course, the history of the Holy and the Prophet could included. This would give visitors an encapsulating view of the Islamic history.

I'm not sure how Mohamed Abdi Yusuf become my uncle, but continue with your usual twaddle,and your empty slogans.

Puntland still exists?

Originally posted by Northerner: It is for the benefit of non-Muslims mostly. It unlikely it will becoe a shrine. [/QB] Again, 30 minutes crash course does little in terms of educating non-Muslims about the Prophet. Also, it is kind troubling to make the Prophet central theme of museum which I'm sure westerners would identify itwith Islam. Maybe instead of this, they might open Islamic institution where scholars can interact and exchange ideas.

It looks like Spitzer might be stepping down afterall. It kind sucks, I was hoping he would have stick it out.

The history of the Prophet's life belong the history books that should be taught to the kids in UAE. Museum would be a tourist destination or shrine for some.And one would hardly learn anything from 30 minute crash course offered by museum.

LoooooooL@brain and PR, is that what Brits tell themselves to feel important in the world affairs?

^It doesn't make a convincing argument as why there is a need for museum dedicated to the Prophet (PBUH).

^How so?