I get a very strong feeling that all this Kismaayo circus is nothing but a red herring. Can the president of Somalia actually do anything to change the situation to his liking (other than talk I mean)? If not, why then has this argument raged for almost a month? Why is everything else about Somalia's progress being ignored and people like our Mukhtar obsessing over a none story? Worse still, why is the capital of Somalia being dragged into the discussion? I am not sure if Mukhtar opposes the Somali president (in fact, I doubt it). But, this whole story has a strong whiff of opposition to the choice of president for Somalia rather than a dispute about who owns Kismaayo (Mukhtar, as ever, is simply reacting to events).

^^ You can get an entire (Chinese made) stadium with seats, astro turf and the whole thing for $20,000, saaxib. You don't even have to do any maintenance. I know of a few Burcaawi Londoners who were working on it.

^^ I know. She's darker than that (just like her mood after the arrest, I bet).

^^ Hope you and yours are fine warya. Did Sandy come for tea last night?

^^ I thought you were still in London. How is this "hospitality" going to be offered? And WHY did I not know about it when I last went there?

^^ Ok. You are right, Torres is washed out. Naga daa hadaba, Alan Shearer.

^^ A quick google search informed me that she set up a political party to contest the upcoming local elections but it was one of those that were rejected for not fulfilling the requirements (she says they did). Later, in a protest against the rejection, her and some of her supporters were arrested (for four hours in her case, more in the case of her supporters) and she alleges that they were beaten and tortured. There is a picture of a pretty girl with red face and hands. Here: http://somalilandsun.com/index.php/politics/609-somaliland-political-unrest-continues http://www.durdurnews.com/Detail.php?id=2282 http://somalilandsun.com/index.php/politics/748-somaliland-disqualified-political-groups-submit-case-to-the-high-court

^^ It's not about who though. It is about him scoring and being there when the chances come. War bahasha baro dee (don't be too English). As for the United keeper making routine saves, go watch the game AGAIN. Naga daa dee.

^^ That's not a "Somali" question anymore, that's an A&T question. Naga daa.

^^ Micheal Cox also says: Manchester United went ahead on the counter as Chelsea dominated the first half, before the away side’s numerical supremacy led to dominance of the final 25 minutes. And says: The pattern of the game reacted significantly to the flow of goals. Just as Manchester United sat back at 2-0 up (or Chelsea dominated because they needed to come into the game, to look at it from the other perspective), Chelsea’s 35-minute period of dominance came to an end as soon as it got to 2-2. His is an opinion that he's not even sure of. What he, I and even YOU are sure of is that Chelsea dominated posession and gave United a torried time (as evidenced by the number of saves the United keeper made, none of which were ROUTINE). United played a counter attacking game (their usual thing) and, in any other day, would have lost this game. Chelsea were all over them. Go watch the game again badow yaho.

Jacaylbaro;884233 wrote: loooooool@Faheema ,,, I agree with you. Waa another planet imika. Norf, useless baad tihiin adiga iyo mid aan ogahay ,,,,, imikaad soo toostay sow maaha Adiga khaladka leh. Maxa NORF kuu geeayay, maad aniga ii sheegtid dee. I had this idea about sewer cleaning and using the stuff as fertiliser. But, obviously, I did no research on it.

^^ I don't even know who she is. Can't decide yet.

Did Che finally close his windows?

^^ Define danger? How many saves did the United keeper make? Were they all routine saves? United played well and WON the game. Nobody is arguing against that fact (though some Chelsea fans may bring the ref's part into it). But Chelsea did play well and put United under extereme preasure. The United keeper was making all sorts of saves and Torres (who you blindly criticise) played his full part in the game. Heck he even got sent off when HE was on the attack. Bax warya.

^^ If true then she must have been sold an idea that is much sexier than the SL one (or she got fedup with SL redtape). ** Hurries away to prepare a bacaac article **

N.O.R.F;884229 wrote: Movement? Is that why Chavski couldn't get through the Utd midfield for 60 mins of the 90? Is that why Utd closed down space so easily most of the game? He had a header, put Mata through, kicked someone in the chest and then got sent off. Waar he had a rubbish game ee bahasha soo ciyaar United closed down space easily? Chelsea couldn't get through for 60 mins of the 90? War did you watch the game dee? If what you say is true, how did the United keeper manage to make all those saves (and there were at least FOUR very good saves he made)? Torres scored four goals in nine PL games so far (not a bad return for a striker). Van Persie, who by all acounts is having a very good season so far, scored seven in nine. Your problem is that you expect Torres to play the way he played for Liverpool. The problem is that wont really happen without Rafa as his manager and the entire team geared towards providing for him. Torres, even when he was scoring goals for fun, has never been prolific for Spain (and Spain is a brilliant team). That's because nobody other than Rafa LFC (and A. Madrid) gave him the type of service that makes him prolific. But he always works hard (even in the dark days of AVB). If you really understood your football, you would know a good striker by the movement he makes and not just the goals he scores. Lakin dee ila guurmaan wax ku barayna; FOLLOW THE MAN, not the ball.

^^ His movement was really good and he set Mata up with a very good chance. I'm not sure what "nothing" means here. It's a team sport, saaxib and he did his part. Bax warya...

Coofle;883410 wrote: AGain...We are blaming the Wrong victims Here.... Qat is equivalent and less harmful than Alcohol in Western Countries Qaybaalad is Equivalent But Nearly/more Harmful than Racism in West.. But we don't see the West Limping because of Alcohol ingestion, Why would we complain of the Green Qat tree ( a strong addictive sedative) with no scientifically proofed Healthcare hazards (Such lung cancer -smoking- and Liver cirrhosis -ethanol) The Real Enemy of Somalia is IGNORANCE Exactly.

Juxa, are you a dealer too? I thought Faheema was the only dealer. (Safe journey).

^^ Err..erm..err..bahasha baro. Both games were brilliant. I enjoyed watching them.

^^ It's the same reason Norf is going to be watching it dee. The kids can't go on their own. Norf, you'll know when you watch the movie. You'll probably have them singing that song all the way back. p.s. Most addicts call their dealers "good friends"

^^ Good movie. You'll love it. (Ra da da da da da da da circus. Da da da da da da da da afro. Circus afro, circus afro, Look at that, look at that, look at that afro (Da da da da da da da da circus>....)

^^ Sorry, Miss. I shouldn't really swear, Miss. I've been influenced by the bad boys here, Miss. Won't do it again.

^^ Faheema smuggles chocolates now? Ciid was good. I did F all.

^^ Morning Malika. Ciid mubarak to you too.