Ducaysane

Nomads
  • Content Count

    1,514
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ducaysane

  1. Hadhoow bay waxay oran waanala xasuuqay. SNM malitia will not remain in LA. Nothing will satisfy me untill Hargaysa falls to the Dariish hands.
  2. That Taano you know in Dubia, Was he another xaaraan-ku-naax?
  3. I agree with Xiin here, If nation with only 10 Million people can not stay together, I dont see how Mogadishuland or Puntland or Jubaland or any other land you have in mind can be a country. Wadaado (without Qabiil Agenda in mind) is the only solution to somalis problem.
  4. Ciid wanaagsan. Ilaahay wadankii na noo dajiyo
  5. BBC has played important role for distroying somali country thru its false propoganda. to see its down fall now is great news for somalis and We have to thank Yusuf Garad job well done.
  6. Canjeelo iyo Beer baad ku waalateen. JAC calooley baan cunaa aaa? war maxaa si kaa ah. waar naga daaya magaceeda yaanan ku matagine.
  7. Lebeling entire qabiil xaaraan-ku-naax is disgusting. killing innocent pple is disgusting as well. Can you keep your moderator role when you insulted entire group of qabiil? Somalis and abusing power go hand in hand. Cajiib
  8. Farah Brown posted: I certainly dont want to see Hussein Aideed,Sh Turki,Buuba & Indhocade on that list,Period. Brother, I feel your notion that the individuals you mensioned are up to no good, I also believe that some of them are in Asmara for Espionage reasons. but to add Hassan Turki on your list is great disservice to the Sheikh. About this convorence, it is another "Shinbirayohow Heesa" meaning it is waste of time.
  9. Copyright © 2007 The American Conservative Can We Win the Ideological War? by Patrick J. Buchanan Asked during World War II why the British continued to fight so ferociously, Churchill is said to have snorted, “If we stop, you’ll find out.” The question arises in the war on terror: we know who the main enemy is, al-Qaeda, the men and movement responsible for 9/11, but what are they fighting for? What is their war all about? A year ago, in Salt Lake City, President Bush, addressing the American Legion, sought to define the war from his perspective: “The war we fight today is more than a military conflict; it is the decisive ideological struggle of the 21st century. On one side are those who believe in the values of freedom and moderation—the right of all people to speak, and worship, and live in liberty. And on the other side are those driven by the values of tyranny and extremism—the right of a self-appointed few to impose their fanatical views on all the rest.” Certainly terrorists who massacre innocents are fanatics. Certainly, the caliphate bin Laden’s acolytes would establish would be tyrannical. But if the enemy were only a cabal of terrorists, hell-bent on establishing a tyranny, they would not be on the verge of expelling us from Iraq and perhaps from Afghanistan. Why are we losing the war if President Bush has correctly defined the stakes in this “ideological struggle”? One reason is that the true goals of bin Laden, the insurgents in Iraq, and the Taliban are not so abstract as those of Mr. Bush. They are concrete, understandable, realizable, and appealing to millions. In his declaration of war on the United States, bin Laden listed three goals: expel U.S. forces from the sacred soil of Saudi Arabia, stop the persecution of innocent Iraqis through U.S.-UN sanctions, and end the Israeli repression and dispossession of the Palestinian people. Not only do these goals have broad appeal to Arab peoples, bin Laden has achieved victory in the first. After 9/11, U.S. forces were pulled out of Saudi Arabia at the request of the king. And while Bush calls this an ideological struggle, the enemy has allied itself with some very powerful ideas. As did Mao and Ho Chi Minh, our enemy has captured the flag of nationalism: We fight to get your troops off our land! We fight to get your hooks out of our government! Leave us to rule ourselves! More importantly, our enemy has rooted his cause in a 1,400-year-old religion that has 1.2 billion adherents, has survived crusades, invasions and occupations, and is growing again in militancy and converts Our enemy, be it Shia or Sunni in Iraq or the Taliban in Afghanistan, claims to be fighting for a rule of law, Sharia, sanctioned by the Koran, and a form of government the Prophet mandates for Islamic peoples. And that is not some secular-liberal, do-your-own-thing democracy. As for the tactics the enemy uses, decent Muslims the world over are said to be growing disgusted with the slaughter by suicide bombers of men, women, and children. But are these not the tactics the French maquis and Italian and Yugoslav partisans used on the Nazis and their collaborators? Was this not the way Israelis expelled the British, the Algerians expelled the French, the Afghans expelled the Soviets, the ANC overthrew apartheid, and Hezbollah drove the IDF out of Lebanon? Clausewitz would understand: terrorism is the extension of Islamist politics by other means. If we know what al-Qaeda is fighting for, what exactly are we fighting for? Taking the president literally, we are fighting for the right of Islamic peoples “to speak, and worship, and live in liberty.” Here we come to our dilemma. Devout Muslims in Islamic lands do not believe people should be free to blaspheme or insult the Prophet. They do not believe all religions are equal or should be treated equally. They do not believe Christians should be free to preach in their lands. The punishment for those who do, and for those who convert from Islam in Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia as well as Iran, is death. Moreover, in every Middle East country, Islamic parties have broadening support. In free elections in Egypt, Lebanon, Palestine, Iraq, and Iran, Islamists made gains or racked up victories. In Turkey, a moderate Islamic party just won national power. It is Western secularism that is in retreat. It is our friends in Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt, Morocco, the Gulf states, and Israel who seem most apprehensive about any more elections among the Arab masses. The Islamists seem to welcome them—and to succeed in them. Should U.S. soldiers die for democracy in the Islamic world, when democracy may produce victory for the political progeny of the Muslim Brotherhood? Is that worth the lives of America’s young?
  10. Nephthys: you don't really need to have a lot of money to have few toy-boys. you know shukaansi become full time job lately. who needs the hassle, I think it is blessing to be a Toy boy now days. less hassle i say. PS: what is up with these weird names pple. I have to errase couple times to spelled it right
  11. I think there is some truth to what the Author wrote. It is well-known fact that women love bad boys. Why do you think I have 3 girl firnds that know each other. Just kidding. any ways, everything that the article said about women can also be said about men.
  12. Goofaartankii xalay markaan gogosha kugu tabay kaa eegay goonyaa kaa waayey garabkayga ilmo gobo ma iga tiri.. Jacayl kaama guuroo gu'ga kuuma tiriyoo gaboow kuguma daayee. Hope that will help, for those somali- challenged folks ( Ok somali songs lyrics challenged)
  13. Kool-Kat, With that schedulle you posted, I think you are iching for divorce.
  14. Uma Zak said: Husband arrives home , gets his lunch n strait to bed what is he doing in the bed. loooool...just kidding, I know what the grown up people do in the bed. This topic reminded me a conversation I had with my granba. I asked If he ever kissed any of his four wives, He told me "afafka qurunkooda maxaan isu taabsiinaynaa" that is how reall geeljire used to treat his wifes, and ya demanding Attention, Romance iyo wixii nin xumeeya.
  15. I think you guys talked about this rape issue too much, regardless the condition of the girl, she should be be raped.the guy and the girl should not be drinking either.
  16. Rape is henious crime and unacceptle but to score politacall points is sickness too.
  17. Damiir laawe, comes to mind when i hear DAlxa's complaints about government postions not distrabuted tribes equally. You have enemy troops in the country that is what he needs to complain about or better yet fight with them.
  18. Siyad Barre was not dictator enough that was his problem. He was weak. He had a chance to kill Aydid and Yey and he missed. What a missed opportunity. Regardless what few nomads believe, Siyad did more good for Somalis then bad. Somali pple miss him.
  19. looooooool. Man, that was cool.
  20. Beerlula, meeshani waa meel lagu soo dhuunto oo aad u wanaagsan. Waana meel qurux badan. Marka aynu kuwada sheekaysano si fiican oo aan is weydaarsano fikrado fiicfiican iyadoon wax dhibaato ah aan la isu gaysan. Caydu ilaa iyo hadda way ku yartahay una malayn mayo inay ragani aqbali doonaan cay iyo Somalinet waxa ka jira. Is daji. Way iska hagaagi.