
N.O.R.F
Nomads-
Content Count
21,222 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by N.O.R.F
-
Looks like male bashing season is back! <<<<holding his ears!
-
I could see you doing some acting in the play, as Aliyet Burcaawi,living on caayd,with sedex buug and two houses, basically ripping the sustem!
-
Puntland rebuffs Somaliland's Mid Wife allegations
N.O.R.F replied to General Duke's topic in Politics
calm down ppl, its on a debate! disagreements can crop up from time to time, freethinkers we all are, but when one we all show disrespect to one another, that aint healthy, now get back to the topic and stop squarrelling on who said what when and how come! -
Owen Bowcott Tuesday November 4, 2003 The Guardian Topical it may have been, but a Devon village pantomime entitled Snow White and the Seven Asylum Seekers has triggered a row about alleged racism and alleged free speech. As the season of goodwill approaches, the small community of Merton, near Okehampton, has been divided by a decision to ban the production unless its title is changed. Half the cast have resigned in protest, rehearsals have been suspended, and the local author, Bob Harrod, has pulled out, blaming political correctness. The seven asylum seekers all have the name Ali: Chemical Ali, Comical Ali, Back Ali, Dark Ali, Bowling Ali, Ali G, and Ali-Kiss-Angel. In the pantomime they work illegally at a quarry near Merton and live in "grotty" conditions in a cottage in the woods, where they are portrayed as living off baked beans and never bathing. Anxious about the show, the village hall's management committee took advice from the Commission for Racial Equality, the Devon and Exeter Racial Equality Council, and the Community Council for Devon. Last week, although the village hall committee had not officially seen the script, it asked Mr Harrod to change his title. "We were not happy with the title, as family entertainment, because it was racially insensitive," explained Tim Horner, chairman. "We are a registered charity and we have to act as a public body. People could understand the quandary we were in." He added that he understood that half the cast had resigned. The advice received from race relations bodies did not suggest the title was illegal, but it warned that as a charitable body the committee "had a duty to act in an inclusive and non-discriminatory way". In the pantomime, the Queen orders Snow White to be executed but she escapes into the woods. There she is taken in by the asylum seekers, whose home she cleans up. The Queen finds her and tries to kill her with a poisoned apple. In the final scene she is revived by a kiss from Prince Charles, who turns up at her funeral after being dumped by Camilla. Mr Harrod, 55, introduced pantomimes to the village - population 200 - when he moved to Devon five years ago. They have raised around £5,000 for the village hall, church and local charities. His comedies exploit controversial topics; in past years it was hunting, and foot and mouth disease. He maintains that his Snow White is more an attack on the government than on asylum seekers, and that he is sympathetic to their plight. "The people doing the complaining have not even seen the script," he said yesterday. "I'm not changing the title. If you changed the title you would have to change the play. "There's nothing racist in the pantomime. If we are taking the mickey out of anyone, it's the government. "The play shows the asylum seekers living in grotty conditions. They work and claim DSS money, which what a lot of people do." looool, cruel white mentality, but kinda funny!
-
lol, remeber hearing this on the radio lst week, u should have heard the guy trying to justify it,lol, the radio ppl were taking the pi*s!!!!
-
Takbeer!
-
Ditto that
-
lol@phaat u mean heavy/hectic?lol
-
i managed to catch the 2nd half and it was a very good game indeed, Juve deserved the win, Di Viao was missing chances like usual but scored a cracker to equalise!
-
^^^lol, OBL has actually been to Highbury to take in a game.... Ok, i'm not into no american games, alittle NBA when they get to the playoffs an thats about it. Football Team: Liverpool, 1 mans name will just say it all, John Barnes! Back then in the late 80s when i arrived here, he was just killing it and so were Liverpool. During the Hillsborough disaster, we saw the Liverpool coach actually going to the stadium before the game while we were playing football in the park. That was one chaotic sunday! Seria A Team: Juve, again one player will explain this, Robby Baggio when Football Italia was on C4 every sunday! Nuff Said! Who else, Division One team, Sheff Utd, obvious why! NBA Team: This changes with the seasons, from the days of Magic and Worthy for the Lakers, to Issiah Thomas for the Pistons, to MJ amd Pippen for the Bulls, Kemp and Payton for the Sonics, right now i dont even know whats happening in the NBA! International Football: England/Brazil/Holland/France/Senagal/Cameroon/ Nigeria/S Africa/
-
lol, i saw both incidents on tv, the guy who got shot was still running around.......as for the the guy on the rugby pitch, hes just crazy, have u seen the size of those rugby players? how can u try to attempt to tackle those guys..... as for the world cup it self, my team Fiji were knocked out against the Scots, now its time to support the All Modows!
-
Britain must confront shameful trade that ruins Congolese lives By Anneke Van Woudenberg 31 October 2003 A few weeks ago, in a quiet corner of a hotel in Kinshasa, the Democratic Republic of Congo's capital, a militia leader told me that 6,000 of his armed men had recently taken control of a gold mine in the north. He reckoned that he could sell 5kg of gold from his new mine for $50,000 (£30,000). He said it would be traded for guns. According to countless reports, those guns, in turn, are used to massacre civilians. Human Rights Watch has documented many of these attacks where men, women and children are brutally killed, raped or mutilated. The drive to control the DRC's vast mineral wealth has been a prime motive for the war. Multinational companies and the DRC's neighbours are accused of profiteering from the war, yet the UN Security Council has taken no action. The war has left more than three million people dead in the past five years. The DRC is blessed or in this case cursed with some of the world's largest diamond reserves, rich gold fields, as well as huge reserves of cobalt and coltan (a mineral used in laptops and mobile phones). All the warring parties have exploited these reserves to finance their military operations and buy weapons, often committing serious human rights abuses in the process. A peace process has begun but the deadly business practices persist. Companies in Britain are among the 85 accused of ignoring fundamental principles and international standards of good practice as laid down in the Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, which spell out how companies should behave. And Britain has failed to investigate even one of them. Britain has also failed to confront the DRC's neighbours, Uganda and Rwanda, who have funded and supported Congolese rebel groups. In the decade before Ugandan troops arrived in the DRC, for example, Uganda exported few diamonds but, once Ugandan soldiers were on the spot, it sold diamonds abroad worth millions of dollars. Rwanda multiplied its exports of coltan in the same way. Uganda and Rwanda have now pulled their troops out of the DRC but they have reportedly kept their economic links with the warlords. It is precisely this murky trade that destroys Congolese lives and undermines hope for the peace process. Looking the other way guarantees continued profits for a few and continued horror for the many. Anneke Van Woudenberg is a senior researcher on the Democratic Republic of Congo for Human Rights Watch
-
By David Usborne in New York 31 October 2003 A panel of experts renewed its warning to the United Nations yesterday that the illegal exploitation of precious minerals in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is continuing to fuel conflict in the country. The Security Council was due last night to discuss a fourth and possibly final report from the panel that has been investigating the parts played by scores of foreign and African-based companies in helping, wittingly or otherwise, to perpetuate the war that has already cost the lives of more than 2.5 million people. "Illegal exploitation remains one of the main sources of funding for groups involved in perpetuating the conflict," the panel said. It urged the international community to block the flow of arms to those groups and continue to put pressure on companies which operate in the Congo to abide by international guidelines of good conduct. "The flow of arms," the report says, "exploitation and the continuation of the conflict are inextricably linked. Breaking that cycle will be key to ending both the conflict and the illegal exploitation of natural resources." The minerals involved include diamonds, cobalt and also the lesser-known coltan, which is used in the manufacture of electronics, such as mobile phones. In its work over three years, the panel has named 157 companies and individuals that warranted investigation into their activities in Congo. Of those parties, which were first identified in an earlier report last year, 119 have given responses to questions posed by the panel, the report said. It adds, however, that 18 companies, including some well-known international operators, either rejected any suggestion that their activities in Congo were questionable or refused to accept that they had any responsibility for the continuing violence. Human rights organisations are pressing the Security Council to seek prosecutions by western governments of some of the companies identified. The plea was made again by a group of organisations, including Oxfam and Human Rights Watch, which issued a joint statement in New York. The Council "can no longer ignore clear evidence linking the exploitation of resources to the war in the Congo," the group said. "It must insist that member states hold the companies and individuals involved to account, including companies based in Western countries. Business must demonstrate its commitment to change the way it operates in conflict situations." Diplomats said the Council was unlikely to press for any prosecutions, however. The UN, which has deployed 10,000 peacekeepers in the country, is anxious not to destabilise the peace process now under way and the progress of the transitional government installed earlier this year. In its annexes, the report sorts the companies into different categories depending on how far their respective cases have been resolved, and nine UK companies are listed as requiring no further investigation. However, four UK-based firms are included in a third category of "unresolved" cases which have been "referred for updating or further investigation". Those companies are De Beers, the giant diamond conglomerate, Das Air, Avient Air and Oryx Natural Resources. Files on these companies have been passed to the UK Government. A spokesman for De Beers, in a statement to the BBC, defended the firm's conduct. "De Beers is the only company that was on the list - on the original list in fact - that had called for sanctions to be applied to those diamond areas within the [DRC] that were feeding rebels there and the conflict," he said. Controversy surrounds a decision by senior UN officials to keep one section of the report sealed. The section deals with information gathered by the panel on senior government and military figures in Congo and neighbouring countries drawn into the war