Yeah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The boys done good!

Having said that, I met a certain wadaad in Burco who was in prison for two years for cleaning up the city of all kinds of filth. He was gaining alot of support before the authorities arrested him. He was doing something very similar to what the students were doing. He thanked Riyaale for his two years in jail and stated he memorised the Quran whilst incarcerated :cool:

Originally posted by Khalaf: quote:Originally posted by Northerner: "Who are the strangers the Prophet scws was refering to in this hadith?" Certainly not kidnappers and murderers. Are you saying what they were doing was right? Are you saying those students who left the building are misguided and should have stayed to fight? Judging from these videos, the interviews with Imam Ghazi, the head female in the madaaraasa and the students, there was no plans nor interest to fight the government/army or to escalate the violence nor any plans to overthrow the government nor interest in power, nor were they talban militants ect ect. This was planned, well calculated, and escalated by the Pakistani government because they wanted to make the Masjid an example. What I Understood was, the masjid surrounded by anti-islamic haraams advised the authorities and the government repeatedly to step in and protect the tenants of Islamic morality in an Islamic Country. Nothing was done by authorities. Prophet Ibrahim scw broke the idols, I see nothing wrong with burning brothels and the like. I know nothing of murders or harassing people-other then the brothel lady and I rather trust the words of the Imams instead of hers, in fact the Masjid was known to shelter rape victims but that of course was underplayed by the media. Believe it or not I know where your coming from but there are ways of doing whats right. This usually requires much patience. Kidnappings are not the way.

Poor so and so doesnt realise he has just given the Quran more publicity, his remarks have resulted in more copies being sold to non-believers this week and some of them will be converted when they have read it. Thank you very much mate,,,,,,

they will be leaving on wed ia,,,,,cant wait

Allah yarxamhum

^^^tried that and doesnt work

I second Xiin and NG As long as my current and future offsprings have a sense of belonging to their homeland(s) then thats enough. Knowing how to control and kick a football would be good too ps why are western raised kids spoilt? I mean when compared to those raised back home. I have five staying with me at the moment and they are doing my head in!!!

People are living on there already. LST, this Arabia saxib. Expect to see a bit of sand on your visit in November

Spreading hatred? A report by the police and Crown Prosecution Service casts doubt on a TV programme which accused several mosques of spreading hatred. Back in January, I blogged about a C4 Dispatches documentary, Undercover Mosque, which had just been broadcast following heavy promotion in the form of full-page adverts taken out in several of our national newspapers. We were informed by the programme makers, Hardcash Productions, that as part of a 12-month investigation they had sent an undercover reporter to several UK mosques which they found were preaching "chilling sermons" and "hatred for non-Muslims and Muslims who do not follow their extreme beliefs". Mainstream Islamic institutions including London's Islamic Cultural Centre in Regent's Park, the UK Islamic Mission and the Markazi Jamiat Ahl-e-Hadith were named and shamed in the programme as allowing their premises to be used for the promotion of hate speech. Now I have been attending the Regent's Park Mosque for around 20 years now and mentioned in my blog that the Imams there "have hardly acquired a reputation for being firebrands. Quite the opposite, in fact". In a joint statement today, the Crown Prosecution Service and the West Midlands police, have said that after reviewing 56 hours of footage of three speakers featured in the documentary, of which only a part was of course used in the final edited programme, they found that: "The splicing together of extracts from longer speeches appears to have completely distorted what the speakers were saying. The CPS has demonstrated that it will not hesitate to prosecute those responsible for criminal incitement. But in this case we have been dealing with a heavily edited television programme, apparently taking out of context aspects of speeches which in their totality could never provide a realistic prospect of any convictions." While the original C4 programme will have reinforced some prejudices people have of Muslims, today's CPS/police statement will, I think more justifiably, reinforce the distrust with which many Muslims regard sections of our media. Hate speech must be combated. Documentary makers have an important responsibility, however, to do their research properly and carefully identify those who actually incite hatred. They must take great care to avoid unfairly stigmatising whole institutions and groups of people. In his book, My Trade - A Short History of British Journalism, the BBC's former political editor, Andrew Marr, said of our newspapers: "Reporting is now so contaminated by bias and campaigning, and general mischief, that no reader can hope to get a picture of what is happening without first knowing who owns the paper, and who it is being published for." Today's CPS/police ruling demonstrates that the situation with our broadcasters is sadly not much better. http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/inayat_bunglawala/2007/08/spreading_hatred.html

I give up,,,,,,,

Looks very nice I know but,,,,,,,,,,scroll down

cidduu ku dhacana 50% buu kala tagaa xishoodka

Me, Barre's Barbarians killed innocents people TFG/Ethios killed innocent people SNM killed innocents people others killed innocents people None of them were justified in killing innocents and none of them can be 'excused'. Wrong is wrong saxib. No need to be selective about it.

IA

The enemy of Somalia was Mr Siyaad Barre! Maybe if Mr Barre had some 'somalinimo' in him he would not have had all tribes trying to over throw him. If you want someone to blame then blame Barre. Full stop. Mise everyone else is wrong and Barre was right? going home now

They havnt announced it yet. There is a Shiah thing going on today in Iraq so maybe they will announce tomorrow,,,

Somalinimo when it suits iga dhe!

Because of Israac wa Mircaaj?

you got a long weekend?

force your self. Your not exhausted. Your blood flow is lazy and needs a kick!

^^Go for a run, does wonders. You will have a boost in energy for a week!

We cannot say that for your sources. Your report was by the US State Dept and so was my source. So what is the difference? Because its not to your taste you say its baised etc? That is what is called crying wolf dear lad I have not denied that there were excesses, but it was the SNM that brought the civilians in harms way not the SNA. You denied it. But what happened to the 'somalino' stuff? Are inncents 'collateral damage'? Read this The dominant SNM, whose fighters had evicted Siad Barre's forces from almost all of Woqooyi Galbeed, Togdheer, and Sanaag regions as early as October 1990, had also captured the besieged garrisons at Berbera, Burao, and Hargeysa at the end of January US State Depart Analysis of Somalia in 1993 Go ahead and tell me this is not worthy aswell saxib. Time for my weekend,,,,

Dawn Essential supplies Daybreak