^ Iwas just watching this

Ngonge, Xabi Alonso made over 2,500 successful passes last season and that was the highest. Also, Fab has the most assists so far this season. Lucas naga daa ninyow. Waa useless!

Dubai mosque child killer to face firing squad Last Updated: January 27. 2010 12:18PM UAE / January 27. 2010 8:18AM GMT An Emirati fishing boat captain was sentenced to death this morning for the rape and murder of a four-year-old boy in a mosque toilet. RR, 30, who admitted to raping and murdering Moosa Mukhtiar Ahmed on the first day of Eid al Adha last year, must first serve six months in jail for consuming alcohol before facing his death by firing squad. Judge Fahmy Mounir Fahmy made his ruling in a packed courtroom at the Dubai Criminal Court of First Instance, explaining the evidence presented during RR's trial showed the assault and murder was "premeditated". "The killer showed no mercy to the child and so the court will show him no mercy," he said. Moosa's father and two uncles immediately began crying and hugging each other when the ruling was made; they were soon congratulated by others seated nearby. The boy's father Mukhtiar Ahmed Khudabaksh, speaking after the judgement, said: "This man deserved this sentence. "I want to thank the people who stood by me and the court for this decision." The judge said a date for RR's appeal hearing was expected to be set imminently. Just as the case was expedited, so would the appeal, he said. http://www.thenational.ae/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100127/NATIONAL/100124957/1133 Timeline January 27: Court unanimously finds R.R.R. guilty and hands out the capital punishment plus six months in jail January 13: Court is told psychiatric tests conclude that although defendant R.R. is mentally stable and sane he is a paedophile obsessed with young boys. January 3: R.R. is ordered to undergo psychiatric evaluation as requested by the Defence. December 30: Court adjourns after hearing witnesses’ statements, including a tearful testimony by the boy's father, who demanded the court hand out capital punishment. December 23: R.R. initially retracted his confession, only to admit committing the crime later. His lawyers refuse to defend him in court due to the nature of the crime, advocate Mohammad Al Sa’adi volunteers to take up the case. The prosecution asks the court to implement death sentence. December 1: Police arrest and charge Emirati suspect, R.R., 30, who confessed to the sexual assault and murder of the boy. November 27: Four-year-old Pakistani boy M.M. is found raped and murdered in the toilet of a mosque in Al Qusais.

It's Africa saxib. The split in the SSC camp is due to 'laaluush'. At the moment SL's bid has been accepted by the most powerful of the SSC. PL's bid isn't good enough and those who want neither ina adeero or ina abtiyo are not influencial enough.

Islam Channel chief executive arrested in South Africa Mohamed Ali Harrath faces deportation to Tunisia over claims he is linked to alleged terror organisation The head of the UK-based Islam Channel has been arrested in South Africa and faces deportation to Tunisia over terrorism charges. Mohamed Ali Harrath, who has advised Scotland Yard on Islamic extremism, had been sought by Interpol and authorities in Tunisia over claims that he was linked to an alleged terror organisation in his homeland. The Islam Channel said Harrath's arrest was a "direct result of the unlawful use" by the Tunisian government of the Interpol red notice system, the international police organisation's highest form of alert, and described it as part of an "established process of harassment and intimidation". Harrath was held at OR Tambo airport after flying into South Africa from London on Sunday. His supporters blamed his arrest on a clampdown by South African authorities in the build-up to this summer's football World Cup, according to reports. A free-to-air English-language service that also broadcasts in Africa, Asia and continental Europe, the Islam Channel is said to be watched by the majority of the two-million-plus Muslims in the UK. Harrath, who has a heart condition, collapsed during his arrest and is being treated at a hospital in Pretoria, under police guard. He created the Tunisian Islamic Front in 1986, which he described as a "non-violent political party founded ... to oppose the one-party state in Tunisia and to seek change through peaceful means". He was convicted in absentia of numerous criminal and terrorism-related offences by Tunisian courts and sentenced to 56 years in prison. The Islam Channel said the offences included "belonging to an unauthorised political party" and distributing leaflets and holding meetings. Harrath arrived in Britain in 1995 and was later accepted as a refugee. He is chief executive of the Islam Channel, which was founded in 2004. • To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. • If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly "for publication". http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/jan/26/mohamed-ali-harrath

Allah yarxamhum The people of SSC need to sort out their internal problems/disagreements and if that means a meeting in Sool then the SL authorities need not intervene. They can try to influence it all they want (laalush) but shouldn't be making sure it doesn't go ahead.

Originally posted by Peacenow: Cause the Maryooleey are good people. Unlike the somalis, they don't cause trouble and suck on other countries.

But his counter is clear and eloquent . Anyway, point taken. However, Hamza has obviously read the book and has written his rebuttal to what he believes are the book’s main arguments. If his rebuttal is perceived as weak by those who have read the book then is it too much for them to elaborate on such a perception? Or has this place been reduced to ‘oh, go and read the book before we have a discussion’ forum? Surely the one disagreeing is required to give reasons and not plain old ‘he is wrong’. I mean, anyone can do that. That could have been my reply to Johnny whenever he posted something with regard to Islam but I didn’t. I would try and explain to him why he was wrong along with any additional information. We are all on a level playing field are we not? Or am I missing something?

How did I miss this? Ngonge, stats don't count here as Lucas and Fab play in different positions. Fab is more often than not under pressure as he is playing higher up the pitch trying to create and/or score whereas Lucas is usually the one the defence pass to. He then passes to the full backs and gets it back again etc. What would interesting is how crucial his passes are considered to be (do they have that?) as you shouldn't read too much into passing sideways and backwards. Any chance of getting Xabi's stats from last year? You will probably see that his stats were the best for his position if not all positions.

We will lose to Wolves tonight.

Going to Xamar with my parents and losing our bags Apparently I was only two but I remember our cousins' house in great detail. See waaye?

^lol shes probably in Blackpool on a sun tan bed An decent TV shows on DVD?

Arab or Asian. We are tracking her down. Is she back in 'Nam' tolow?

Had to labour to make myself a cuppa.

And you're not getting what I'm getting at 1: You don't seem to be familiar with the arguments Mr Hamsa uses, because if you did, you'd ask yourself how can Hamsa use arguments Mr Dawkins cements under his feet, without raising them from the rabble. Again, this is another case of you saying something and believing it to be correct WITHOUT presenting any form of back-up. Simply repeating Dawkins has dealt with the issue doesn't mean he is right nor does it mean you're right. Get it? One needs a bit more than 'but he is wrong' to chew on. 2: You don't seem to have read the book in question , because if you did , you'd be ashamed of Hamsa brushing off the dazzled argument of personal experience ( and all those dubenked arguments)to counter Dawkins in what he calls a response. You're correct in that I haven't read the book but why would I be ashamed as Hamza has quite clearly and eloquently countered the book's main spine? Are you saying Dawkins' main arguments are not those countered by Hamza? Are you saying the book is credible? Are you saying the book has no flaws? What are you saying? Oh, you're saying 'he is wrong'.

Its a nice 26 degrees C here just like the past 3 weeks Sheh, you know why Rudy writes like he does? Are you in LA? :eek:

^So where did you go?

^It won't be the same atmosphere as in Cairo or Khartoum but scores are still to be settled. Ahmed Hassan played a blinder last night. What a player!

Originally posted by 2+2=5: quote:Originally posted by General Duke: described as the Godfather of the 21st Century... God I hope not. That movie was just plain boring. A real colossal bore with shockingly bad audio design, average story and average acting at its best (apart from Pacino). It's such a cliche to praise this film to high heavens, everybody is supposed to like it because the critics have denounced it a masterpiece (that and part II). Well I say Godfather sucked! I'll take Goodfellas, Scarface and Eastern Promises, anyday, over that unbelievably pretentious bore Totally agree. Godfather II was a good movie but the other two were a wast of time. Good gangstar movies are usually ones below the radar. Carlito's Way and Clockers are great films. Originally posted by MAXIMUS POWERS: I heard this film is tipped for great success. The best french film of all time is La Haine La Haine - Full Movie on Youtube A French version of 'Boyz In The Hood' or 'Kidulthood'. A brilliant and brutal Multi Award Winning movie showing the side of Paris that doesnt show up on the tourist map. Following 3 Young Men/Teenagers trapped in the Parisian economic, ethnic and social underclass. If you ever go to Paris venture into St Denis (location of the film). It's probably been modernised now but it's still an eye opener and has a great weekend market where you can buy just about anything. :cool:

First time I've seen the highlights. What hopeless defending by Ivory Coast. Algeria vs Egypt will be a HOT game.

Comical Cameroon. What a waste of space!

LoL Talk about about madax adeyg! My objection has a basis in that the one making the claim has no proof and hasn’t done a good enough job of elaborating on his views. You haven’t even attempted. In addition, one doesn’t consider another post on another thread as ample proof. You seem to be referring to it as an article for some reason. For one advocating for an adult discussion you do seem to be lacking an adult’s comprehension skills. Your argument has failed.

Originally posted by Johnny B: Norf, No, he is not laying, Mr hamza,Your source, just happens to be wrong in believing that one could start believing in a God or Gods from the arguments he listed, which some of them unluckily Dawkins hollows them out of any rationality substance, specially, "The argument from personal experience;" in the very book in question, namely, "The God delusion". Next time , present as many articles as you wish , but atleast study the arguments ( hopefully read the book in question ) and wrap Norf's taste on it. Gee that sounds like something Johnny has been asked to do on numerous other occasions. Is the shoe on the other foot now? I have basically done what you’ve been doing for years in post something that in my opinion stands up to the atheist argument. All you’ve done is reply with ‘he is wrong so there’. Apologies for kindling a brain cell or two

So there we have it. Johnny’s response is “he is lying!” The usual response when he encounters an argument peppered with what an atheist considers the ‘holy grail’ ie reason, rationale, intellect (insert what I have missed Johnny). As you were saxib.

Bahalka ay dumarku tumaan at weddings and singing 'ho something or other' with 18 stone women jumping up higher than olympic athletes and then landing more gracefully than a ballerina! That's what first comes to mind when thinking of Somali dance.