The ethics of stealing a WiFi connection

[Baashi]

The ethics of "stealing" a WiFi connection

By Eric Bangeman | Published: January 03, 2008 - 09:12PM CT

 

Network security firm Sophos recently published a study on what it terms WiFi "piggybacking," or logging on to someone's open 802.11b/g/n network without their knowledge or permission. According to the company's study, which was carried out on behalf of The Times, 54 percent of the respondents have gone WiFi freeloading, or as Sophos put it, "admitted breaking the law [in the UK]."

 

Amazingly, accessing an unsecured, wide-open WiFi network without permission is illegal in some places, and not just in the UK. An Illinois man was arrested and fined $250 in 2006 for using an open network without permission, while a Michigan man who parked his car in front of a café and snarfed its free WiFi was charged this past May with "Fraudulent access to computers, computer systems, and computer networks." On top of that, it's common to read stories about WiFi "stealing" in the mainstream media.

 

It's time to put an end to this silliness. Using an open WiFi network is no more "stealing" than is listening to the radio or watching TV using the old rabbit ears. If the WiFi waves come to you and can be accessed without hacking, there should be no question that such access is legal and morally OK. If your neighbor runs his sprinkler and accidentally waters your yard, do you owe him money? Have you done something wrong? Have you ripped off the water company? Of course not. So why is it that when it comes to WiFi, people start talking about theft?

 

The issue is going to come to a head soon because more and more consumer electronics devices are WiFi-enabled, and many of them, including Apple's iPhone and most Skype phones we've used, come ready out of the box to auto-connect to open WiFi networks. Furthermore, as laptop sales continue to grow even beyond desktops, the use of open WiFi is only going to grow along with it.

 

Steal this WiFi connection!

 

When you steal something, there's typically a victim. With WiFi, Sophos thinks the ISPs are the victims. "Stealing WiFi Internet access may feel like a victimless crime, but it deprives ISPs of revenue," according to Sophos' senior technology consultant Graham Cluley. Furthermore, "if you've hopped onto your next door neighbors' wireless broadband connection to illegally download movies and music from the 'Net, chances are that you are also slowing down their Internet access and impacting on their download limit." In Sophos' view, then, both ISPs and everyday subscribers can be victims.

 

In one fell swoop, "stealing WiFi" gets mentioned in the same breath as "illegally" downloading movies and music. The fact is, people join open WiFis for all manner of reasons: to check e-mail, surf the web, look up directions to some place, etc. Those don't sound like nefarious activities, however, and certainly not activities which are likely to get someone in trouble. Of course if you run an open WAP (wireless access point) and it is heavily used for just e-mail, you could still hit your bandwidth cap (if you even have one), but that has to happen only once for that user to figure out what's up, and fix the problem. And let's be honest: it is their problem. No one forced that user to install a WAP or to leave it wide open. We'll get back to this in a minute.

 

The argument that using open WiFi networks deprives ISPs of significant revenue is also a red herring. Take the case of public WiFi hotspots: official hotspots aren't that difficult to find in major cities—every public library in Chicago has open WiFi, for instance. Are the public libraries and the countless other free hotspot providers helping defraud ISPs? No, they're not. There's no law that using the Internet requires payment of a fee to an ISP, and the myriad public hotspots prove this.

 

Really, there's only one time when you could argue that an ISP is being gypped, and that's when someone is repeatedly using his neighbor's open WiFi in lieu of paying for his own service. Is this really wrong? Let's consider some parallel examples. If the man in question were given a key and told that he could enter his neighbor's house whenever he wanted to use a PC to access the Internet, would this be wrong? Of course not. They key here (pun intended) is the "permission" given by the owner of the home. Our leeching friend would clearly be in the wrong if he were breaking into the house, of course, because he would be sidestepping something clearly set up to keep him out. If he has permission, I suppose one could argue that it's still not right, but you won't find a court that will punish such a person, nor will you find too many people thrilled at the idea that someone else can tell them who they can and can't allow into their homes for what purposes.

 

Some people leave their wireless access points wide open deliberately. A friend of mine and recent seminary graduate lived in a campus-owned apartment building. In addition to being a man of the cloth, Peter is a longtime Linux user and open-source advocate. While living here in Chicago, he got his DSL from Speakeasy and shared the connection with others in his building... and anyone else who needed a quick Internet fix (Speakeasy even encouraged this). He even positioned his router so that anyone in the church across the street could pick up a signal.

Obviously, not everyone is like Peter. But despite easy-to-read instructions and a plethora of warnings about the need to secure your WAP, some people just can't be bothered to enable the most basic security settings.

 

To the person with a laptop and a sudden need to check e-mail or surf the web, it's not possible to tell who is leaving their access points open deliberately and who just plain doesn't care. The access point is there and the virtual doors are unlocked, so why not take advantage of it if you're in need?

 

A couple of caveats: be familiar with the law of the land. As the examples at the beginning of this story show, it's illegal to access a WAP without permission—even if it's wide open—in some places. Also, you should never use an open point for anything illegal or even unneighborly. Don't log onto the first "linksys" WAP you see and fire up a torrent for your favorite, just-released Linux distro.

 

And as always, don't leave your own 802.11b/g/n router wide open unless you're comfortable with random surfers using your 'Net access for their own purposes.

 

Open WiFi is clearly here to stay.

 

Source

[Laba-X]

I plead guilty!

[Nin-Yaaban]

how is' t stealing? most people setting up a WiFi have the option of locking it if they didn't want other people getting on their network. so if its open, then its free for everyone and its not stealing.

[Seekknowledge]

Maybe they don't know they need to lock it therefore it is stealing. Sorry Baashi and Laba.....(can't say that my mama will ground me for life)

[Nin-Yaaban]

if they can set one up, then they damn well know that it could be locked or set free.

[Libaax-Sankataabte]

Most hackers leave their mannequin Wi-Fi units open deliberately with the intention that you may "join” the party. These "party animals" are waiting for you and are ready to greet you at the door with much contentment and a great pleasure. The festivities start the minute you bang the door, and the party, more often than not, lasts longer than you can imagine. You as the “great champion of the freeloader camp”, bring much needed "celebrity" flavor to the party.

[Paragon]

I got a problem with my wifi connection. I am not stealing it; its under my name but it seems some hacker has taken the liberty to oust me. I still have an excellent connection signal but there isn't any data on the browser. Tried the WEP key re-inputing many times, even re-installed xp on the notebook but still nothing...Where are the geeks!

 

Bloody stealers...give me back my internet (I say that with a face).

[Geel_jire]

If someone is broadcasting unsecured Wi-Fi signals into my home. I assume permission unless otherwise stated.

 

After all, I was generous enough to allow the Radiation into my home, he/she should be generous enough to share the link.

 

people are going Wi-fi crazy these days. I admit it has it's usefulness (mobility). but if you do not truly need it there is no reason for you to have wi-fi it is less secure , much more slower than cable.

 

The worst wireless devices i can think of is a wireless Mouse/Keyboard. they usually need external power i.e battery, they are very insecure, the advantage of mobility does not apply in this case as you will never move more than a few feet from the system unit.

[Pujah]

I don't think most people care if you use their connection as long as you're not doing too many upload/downloads and bogging down the network. In which case they may just decide to take few minutes to secure their network.

[5]

I think we should be able to sue the person who doesn't secure their network, because their WiFi waves intrude into our homes. In my humble opinion it is clearly a breach of privacy of some sort. Now instead of complaining and feeling utterly low, if we wished to turn this invasion into a benefial thing for us, we should be able to do so.

 

P.S. if I kicked a ball into your house, with no intention of collecting it later, and you decided to play football with it, could you be blamed for stealing?

 

(This whole issue is ridiculous!)

[peasant]

I have ethio neighbor and the guy had unsecured dlink router that kept popping on my macbook all the time. For a while i was a leech until one night my ********* over powered me and i decided to download Solaris OS close to 5 gig data. The flowing night the guy was no were to be seen again and prior to this i knew he was on a quota system were he was limited to a 6 gig data download per month. I think the ISP gave him a shitt and told him to secure his box or loose the service. Perhaps if it wasn't my foolishness i could have been a leech for a while and wouldn't worry about getting bloody expensive dsl/cable connection. At the moment i am thinking experimenting wifi high gain antennas coupled with wireless signal repeater as i often see some unsecured networks with weak signals popping. For me the rules of engagement are you either secure it or else be shared. There are plenty of wifi intrusion software like kismac out there but i do think it is wrong to break a secured network.

[peasant]

Isseh ( i am not a hacker but i will try if i can help you)

 

if you are unable to connect to the router through wirelessly then plug the ethernet cable to the router and to your computer. Then type the ip address of the router in the address bar of your browser. Depending on the brand you are using, for instance dlink routers have default ip address of 192.168.0.1 and the default login id is admin with no password and linksys ip address is 192.168.1.1 and the pasword try admin. If you get an access then change the setting and secure it very nicely with WPA encryption as it is better than WEP and also hide your ssid as it invites newbie hackers. If you cant log on then reset the router physically by following the manufacture's manual. i hope this addresses your problem.