Rafa drew with FC Twente last night He won't inspire them.

^Miyaanu ka baqayn haday xabadi badhida kaga dhacdo?

Probably closer to the truth than anything I've read today.

Originally posted by AfricaOwn: Dallo is a great East African Airline. Don't listen to him folks. Typical I tell the owner the same thing

Oo is ******* offensive to A&T and Co.? [ September 14, 2010, 03:24 PM: Message edited by: Admin ]

Roy has only been in the job two months. Rafa will lose the Scudetto (with the best squad in Seria A).

***** invasion lol A&T, you didn't write the first post. [ September 14, 2010, 12:35 PM: Message edited by: Admin ]

I very nearly did the next level up (EUFA B Cert) on more than one occasion (didn't want to pay a grand for it). You left early? So they didn't take you pro Rafa stance seriously heh.

Waar bax. Bahashana daawo Ps I'm a qualified FA Coach Pps, what was being discussed on Eid night? Heh.

^Saxib, when you're a centre back (I'm assuming you have played at centre back even though it was probably in the 80s ) and you're defending crosses from open play don't you get yourself into a position between the keeper and striker (i.e. a zone)? Or position youself in a way for you to get to the ball first? Players, by default, play in zones anyway (positions). This does not change because defending at corners has changed. If we were to go by your comment there, a switch from zonal marking at corners also means man-marking all over the pitch Wax fahan!

Anyone have any good business ideas? Evening all.

Old soviet era planes should be banned from Somali skies. Too old and no maintenance. I would advise you all not to go via Djibouti on Daallo.

Zonal marking teaches players to mark their own zones [at corners and set pieces ONLY] . It becomes second nature to them (and was proven right in the previous seasons). Once you start fiddling with it (at corners and free kicks) you mess up the players' positional sense in all other occassions [including in open play even though you are marking your zone as you're playing in your position and defending] . How someone can say that and still claim he is right I don't know Only Titus

LoooooL Kubad goormaa kugu dambeesay saxib? Titus LoL

How does every cross become confusing when zonal marking was only at corners under Rafa? In transition you mark the centre forward. The problem was Lucas and Poulson not picking up the runners. Aar dhaawo bahasha.

Zonal marking was only at corners and all Brum chances came from open play Lucas had a stinker because he can't make his mind up and can't pass. Same tactics as Rafa and Maxi wasn't even playing.

Waxaagu waa answer a question with a question. Bal horta ta lagu weydiiyey ka dabaalo.

You're answer was along the lines of AS' actions being justified because they are fighting an occupying force. You're yet to show me how this is Islamically correct. You're using an Ayah in a Surah that is irrelevant to what we're discussing. Why not quote one of the Ayahs and ahadeeths regarding the conduct in war and jihad? Selective Islam miya? As for intellect and what not, slinging mud in discussions only shows you're inability to put forth your argument clearly. Throw in an ayah here and there and WALLA. Cawaale, a simple question saxib. 6 pages later and they're still avoiding to answer it.

What a poor game lol. Bham were well organised and had at least 6 or 7 players in front of their goal everytime we got into the final third. We might as well have played with 10 men as Maxi did nothing (again). Lucas was his usual slow, passes astray self. The good news is he won't be starting anymore. You could see the difference in class when Meireles came on. Manure next week.

Wax islama haysid dhe heh

Maad, Jawaabta aan indin ka hely is 'the civilians dying is a necessary effect' (you have all acknowledged AS are wreckless). This is not Islamically correct (far from it). But somehow you still argue they're on the right side of Islam. My friend, the two (AS' actions and Islam), cannot be reconciled (irrespective of all the other AMISOM and TFG issues).

Saxib, iga daa the selective verses and the guilt trip. I’m sure bombing a university graduation ceremony was accidental and unintentional. This is a very simple discussion. All I want from you is to confirm whether or not AS’ actions are in line with Islam. I can also point to numerous occasions, pick out various statements, refer to the Quran and ahadeeth (showing where AS are wrong), refer to what the Somali Ulama have agreed upon with regard to AS etc etc. I’m not defending or justifying AMISOM’s actions. I just want a straight answer from you, Red or Maadeey. Are AS’ actions (take the university graduation ceremony as an example), in accordance with Islam (that was not accidental)? Forget AMISOM, forget the TFG, forget the Ethios, forget any alleged stance I held previously, forget everything. Just answer the above question.

Simple questions Karl, what is the difference between AS killing civilians (at the airport) and AMISOM killing civilians (in Bakara market)? What gives AS the right to do what they do? Is this Islamically correct? Bal ka soo fakar. Ps I don’t want you to diverge away from these questions. I want you to answer in a clear and concise manner.

It was a great day for sport. Prem, La Liga and Calcio results. Djokovic beating Fed Express in 5 sets. USA and host nation Turkey getting into todays Basketball final F1 qualifying More to come today!

Red, What you have there and what you have been giving us is your opinion. That’s fine. We are all entitled to our opinions (even if there is disagreement). However, when confronted with FACTS one needs to address those facts and not hide behind their partisan opinions. I have given you facts on the ground. Facts that AS are doing the same things as you’re accusing AMISOM of, facts that what AS are doing is not Islamic etc. So far you haven’t countered any of those facts. You have even gone as far as claim victims of AS’ actions are a necessity (waar Ilaahay ka baq).