Sign in to follow this  
Xudeedi

American Navy forces Infiltrate Bosaso port. (port closed)

Recommended Posts

Xudeedi   

According to this news, Apparently, the Pentagon officials has ordered its Navy forces to infiltirate this port on an allegation that it is the main source of smuggling activities. Besides, these military officials see no legitimate administration anywhere in Somalia.

 

Dekeda wayn ee Magaalada Bosaso oo saaka gebi ahaanba albaabadu u xiranyihiin ka Dib markii ay Ciidamada Bada Maraykanaka iyo kuwa Puntland ay iskumaan dhaafeen.

 

Dekeda Magaalada Bosaso ee Xarunta Gobolka Bari ayaa Saaka Xiran Mana Jiraan Wax Dhaqdhaqa oo Dekedaasi saakay ka kala Soconaya Waxaana ay ku Waaberiisatay Maanta in Si Rasmi ah ay u Xirnaato Go aankaasi oo ay Soo Dejiyeen Ciidamada amaanka ee ilaalada Xeebaha Puntlnad oo isku Dayey inay Gacanta Ku so Dhigaan Doonyo iyo Maraakiib Si Sharci daro ah uga Sahqaysanaysa Xeebta Magalada Bosas.

 

 

Waxaa Saaka ka taagan Dekeda Magaalada Bosaso Xiisad Colaadeed taasi oo Iminka Siwayna looga Cabsi Qabo in uu Dagaal ka dhaco 2 Ciidan ee isku Horfadhiya Gudaha Dekeda Magaalada Bosaso Ciidamo Maraykan ah oo ay Wataan Kooxo Burcada ayaa Ku sugan Dekeda Bosaso waxaana ay ku Qalabaysan yihiin Hub Waxaana Saaran Dad Cadaana oo u dhashay Dalkaasi Maraykanka Waxaana ay Shegeen Ciidamada Maraykana iyo kuwa kalee Gacanta ka heliya ee ka soo Jedaa Puntland inay Xabad Kaga jawaabayaan Werarka ay Doonayaan inay Soo qadaan Ciidamada Amaanka ee Haatan ku Horfadhiya Dekeda Magalada Bosaso ee Xarunta Gobolka Bari.

 

 

Ciidanka Amaanka ee Xeebaha Puntland ayaa shaqada dekeda Hakiyey ka dib markii ay Arkeen oo ay garteen Ciidamadan mareekanka ah ee Gudaha u soo galay Dekeda wayn ee Magaalada Bosaso.

 

Waxaa ay Ciidamada amaanka Xeebaha Puntland Sheegayaan oo iminka ay ujeedadoodu tahay inay Gacanta ku soo dhigaan kooxa Horseedka ka ah Keenitaanka Ciidamada shisheeye Xeebaha DGPL Mana Doonayaan inay Wax dhib ah u geystaan Ciidamada Puntland Dadka ajaanibta ah ee ka soo Jeeda Dalka Maraykanka Balse waxa ay Sheegayaan Ciidanka ilaalladu in Hadii ay Kooxa haasi Sidaas wax ku sii wadaan ay Xaladu is bedelasyo oo ay Dagaal noqonayso

 

Ma jirto Wax dhaq dhaqaaq ah oo Saaka ka jirey Dekeda Wayn ee Magaalada Bosaso Guud ahaan waxaa ku Xayiran Doonyo iyo Marakiib Donayey inay Maanta Dejiyaan Rarka iyo Xamuulka ay wadaan.

 

Lama garanayo Halka ay ku dambayn Doonta Xaladaasi ka aloosan Saaka Dekeda Magaalada Bosaso ee Xarunta Gobolka bari.

 

 

Maxamed Axmed Ciise

 

 

Dhahar.ocm

 

 

Geedi7@hotmail.com

 

 

Bosaso Somaliya

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Xudeedi   

Somalia is Somalia to them. Our country is so vulnerable to acts of betrayal and sabotage. We have to bear the tragedies of the "war on terror" and the direct consequences of the Congress' support for strategic shift of America's foreign policy to the Military since Sep 9, 2001.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Xudeedi   

America's militarized foreign policy is a failure

Jeffrey Sachs , December 3, 2007

 

Many of today's war zones - including Afghanistan, Ethiopia, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan, Somalia, and Sudan - share basic problems that lie at the root of their conflicts. They are all poor, buffeted by natural disasters - especially floods, droughts, and earthquakes - and have rapidly growing populations that are pressing on the capacity of the land to feed them. And the proportion of youth is very high, with a bulging population of young men of military age (15-24 years).

 

All of these problems can be solved only through long-term sustainable economic development. Yet the United States persists in responding to symptoms rather than to underlying conditions by trying to address every conflict by military means. It backs the Ethiopian Army in Somalia. It occupies Iraq and Afghanistan. It threatens to bomb Iran. It supports the military dictatorship in Pakistan.

 

None of these military actions addresses the problems that led to conflict in the first place. On the contrary, American policies typically inflame the situation rather than solve it.

 

Time and again, this military approach comes back to haunt the United States. The US embraced the shah of Iran by sending massive armaments, which fell into the hands of Iran's revolutionary government after 1979. The US then backed Saddam Hussein in his attack on Iran, until the US ended up attacking Saddam himself. The United States backed Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan against the Soviet Union, until the US ended up fighting bin Laden. Since 2001 the US has supported Pervez Musharraf in Pakistan with more than $10 billion in aid, and now faces an unstable regime that barely survives.

 

US foreign policy is so ineffective because it has been taken over by the military. Even postwar reconstruction in Iraq under the US-led occupation was run by the Pentagon rather than by civilian agencies. The US military budget dominates everything about foreign policy. Adding up the budgets of the Pentagon, the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, the Department of Homeland Security, nuclear-weapons programs, and the State Department's military assistance operations, the US will spend around $800 billion this year on security, compared with less than $20 billion for economic development.

 

In a stunning article on aid to Pakistan during the Bush administration, Craig Cohen and Derek Chollet demonstrated the disastrous nature of this militarized approach - even before the tottering Musharraf regime's latest crackdown. They show that even though Pakistan faces huge problems of poverty, population, and environment, 75 percent of the $10 billion in US aid has gone to the Pakistani military, ostensibly to reimburse Pakistan for its contribution to the "war on terror," and to help it buy F-16s and other weapons systems.

 

Another 16 percent went straight to the Pakistani budget, no questions asked. That left less than 10 percent for development and humanitarian assistance. Annual US aid for education in Pakistan has amounted to just $64 million, or $1.16 per school-aged child.

 

The authors note that "the strategic direction for Pakistan was set early by a narrow circle at the top of the Bush administration and has been largely focused on the war effort rather than on Pakistan's internal situation." They also emphasize that "US engagement with Pakistan is highly militarized and centralized, with very little reaching the vast majority of Pakistanis." They quote President George W. Bush as saying, "When [Musharraf] looks me in the eye and says ... there won't be a Taliban and won't be Al-Qaeda, I believe him, you know?"

 

This militarized approach is leading the world into a downward spiral of violence and conflict. Each new US weapons system "sold" or given to the region increases the chances of expanded war and further military coups, and to the chance that the arms will be turned on the US itself. None of it helps to address the underlying problems of poverty, child mortality, water scarcity, and lack of livelihoods in places like Pakistan's Northwest Frontier Province, Sudan's Darfur region, or Somalia. These places are bulging with people facing a tightening squeeze of insufficient rainfall and degraded pasturelands. Naturally, many join radical causes.

 

The Bush administration fails to recognize these fundamental demographic and environmental challenges, that $800 billion of security spending won't bring irrigation to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Sudan, and Somalia, and therefore won't bring peace. Instead of seeing real people in crisis, they see caricatures, a terrorist around every corner.

 

A more peaceful world will be possible only when Americans and others begin to see things through the eyes of their supposed enemies, and realize that today's conflicts, having resulted from desperation and despair, can be solved through economic development rather than war. We will have peace when we heed the words of President John F. Kennedy, who said, a few months before his death, "For, in the final analysis, our most basic common link is that we all inhabit this small planet. We all breathe the same air. We all cherish our children's future. And we are all mortal."

 

 

Jeffrey Sachs is a professor of economics and director of the Earth Institute at Columbia University. THE DAILY STAR publishes this commentary in collaboration with Project Syndicate © ( www.project-syndicate.org ).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this