burahadeer;829369 wrote: and only Somali girl has hijab among the muslim arabs...:confused: same we have Shabab & they don't.!!!!!!!! stuff and non sense.

the kind of state Somalia is, eludes the understanding BTW, do we need one?

Bluelicious;829299 wrote: sharma-arke451 & Paragon - And for all the people who don't know that love exist or are not sure about it this applies to you. Love is something that exists in this world and is also mentioned in surat Ar-Rum verse 21 in the quran. You can find love before marriage or after marriage just look around you in the world and you will see. that is where we part ways. @blessed,saas ma istiri? lol.

@ NUUNE, congrats sxb. what a vision. men like you are among us after all,,,,,, i wonder with the fella who is suggesting a female president as a recovery developmental vision for Somalia?

NGONGE;829013 wrote: ^^ True. True. Were the wadaads excluded from the early consultations on this whole thing, and, did they get to have a peek at the current draft yet? not only the wadaads, somaliweyn is yet to see it. BTW, have you seen a copy of the draft, yourself?

xaajiyow, is there true love?? some think, it is contradiction in terms. bal wax ka dheh

you forgot the religious reason, and i believe that is what you miss.

lol@abtigis so your support is a girl away? sir fakatay iga dheh.

although this is just a report and not the research itself, some assumptions are clearly not right. for example: the assumption that faith is absolutely a result of intuition or intuitive thinkers are more likely to be religious or even analytic thinking actually causes disbelief it is important we appreciate the difference between denial and proof. someone can deny with or without proof. so, sincerity of purpose is the caliber.

nice pics mr. coofle

Garnaqsi;820377 wrote: I want to cry. An amazing woman! May she rest in peace and love. ileen ninyo mararka kale waad iska yeyeshaa,,,,,,,, allah haunaristo

good read. Thanks for sharing, sister. implementing the good, is as hard toil as knowing it. may Allah guide us all.............amin

Raamsade;819883 wrote: NORF, the natural state of affairs, the default of position of nature is non-existence until such time some adduces evidence to the contrary. So, atheist affirming his lack of believe in Allah doesn't need evidence for his lack of believe. In fact, you're asking him/her to prove a negatie which is impossible. Can you prove there is no invisible teapot orbiting the moon. If not, how are you any different from atheist? i hope the word in the bold means negative, if so, then you are committing a fallacy in informal logic. BTW, the lack/absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence. at least you accept that, some true/facts are impossible to prove,, like the negative nooo Raamsade;819883 wrote: While we can't disprove Allah's existence by appealing to evidence, we can however cite the self-refuting attributes of Allah. Take for instance, Allah's attributes of Just and Merciful. These are self-refuting and contradictory. To be merciful to someone means to be unjust to someone else. Allah can't both, He must be one or the other. this amounts to insult, and LSt has to act

Johnny B;819759 wrote: Is is sad that we've to walk you through the labyrinths of sound reasoning at this age , but we can always try . tertium non datur, as it were. (A) Life should be conducted according to someone who claims to have talked to a Deity. (B)Life should not be conducted according to anyone who claims to have talked to a Deity. If (A) is not convincing,or untrue (B) can not be non-convincing or untrue, and vice versa. AYOUB, The argument of Atheism being another Religion has been addressed. For a conclusion to be acceptable as true, there must be evidence to support it. your statements represent a false dichotomy.

Garnaqsi;819695 wrote: Even scientific-wise lack of evidence justifies out-right rejection unless there is a credible explanation as to why the evidence is missing. this statement needs evidence.

The government of New Zealand is running an online poll on Yahoo! to know our opinion about banning HIJAB in their country... Please help our sisters out by voting NO... We are currently losing at 41%... Please VOTE and Share! http://nz.news.yahoo.com/polls/popup/-/poll_id/55492/

Qandalawi;818499 wrote: Excellent start, this makes the speculations and the hope we had even closer to reality. A bit by bit we are getting there, all the signs and finally what remained waa isagii lashubtaa sidaa kuwait. Waar yaa raba in wakiil laga noqdo, kolay hadhowbaad soo shaqa doonanaysaanee, without sponsorship wax soconaayaa majiraan, whoever wants to be sponsored submit your application early and before the black gold sale kicks off, otherwise I will be inundated will applications markaa dee busy ayaan iska noqdayba, waa first come first serve This worries me more, if the sentiment reflects the view of the tolka. This can't be a joke,,,,, Even if it is the view of an individual,,,,,,,,baruur ayaa ********* **** qurmiso another fella says ''gabdha reer bari guursada'',,,,,,,,,,,,sheekada weey isa soo tareesa. allow sahal

Garnaqsi;818139 wrote: Waaba yaabaayey ducaa wiil dhali! What exactly would make that hard? It's a simple statement which might well be true. I don't know what you meant by 'one wonders, what you people are? ' , though. It's at times like this you seem to be speaking in riddles. you are against religion yet you accept it to define you? Think over this. On general note; without sincerity of purpose, an argument will not be different from a quarrel. of course there is a scholastic approach to a legitimate argument. there should be a common definition base, which acts as reference pertaining to the use of terms. for example, prove. what someone sees as prove, might not be what the other sees as prove. rules of engagement

Garnaqsi;817935 wrote: I fail to see the conclusions which one can draw from that question. I even let him have it that no definition of atheism is possible without a definition of religion and he still couldn't get anywhere with it. If you believe you can, then by all means go on, Nuune. if you fail to see then i am of help. for atheism to exist, there must be a religion; this is the hard truth. one wonders, what you people are? Raamsade;818010 wrote: Which religion? There are many religions. at least you know there are many religions. do you need a prove for this?

Garnaqsi;817452 wrote: Okay, so you say any definition of atheism requires a definition of religion. Let's say that's true. What does your question entail in that respect? I don't know what you mean by 'why the pretense'. I don't mean to nag you; I honestly have no idea what it might be. your stance is not clear, . pretence=iska yeel yeel. can you define atheism without religion?

Johnny B;817589 wrote: And what is the name of the Deity they worship?, what are their rituals ? what is the name of their church/mosque/ temple? Atheism is simply the lack of belief in gods( Deities), claiming Atheism is some sort of Religion is like claiming nakedness is some some sort of modelling or ball-headedness is some sort of hair-styling. a significant progress into your narrow definition of Deity. Rebutting Senior Che's and Mr Sharmarke's blunders . Really?, Atheism is lack of belief in god or gods, just the opposite of Theism which means having belief in god or gods. Atheism doesn't need particular Religion to be defined as you patently claim , it simply is the opposite of Theism. you failed to understand the meaning of the words in the bold above. ain't that religion?

http://http://www.aljazeera.com/news/africa/2012/04/2012410191313432342.htmlread this also.

blessed ayan la qabaa.

Malika;817415 wrote: ^He means - atheism feeds on religions - what will it be if it there werent religions? Sharmarke - that was my interpretation of your question.. Malika, can't be interpreted better. you said it right. Garnaqsi;817420 wrote: I've read it that way as well, but I was hoping that there was bit more to it than being rhetorical. will you ever be on the run wa yabee. be a man. the question still stands,, no one can define ''atheism'' without religion. so i wonder, why the pretence.

~~~~definitely it would be too strange to propose to a person you just met in school environs or even on the streets. prior concrete knowledge of the person is an asset. the true knowledge of the your potential partner has a direct link to the comfort of your marital life. having said all that, at least you have the mr/mrs right with you by now. a serious note: what worked for someone else may not work for you. so to say, no one rule applies. prayers and sincere of purpose will deliver the BEST results.