AYOUB Posted October 25, 2004 Originally posted by Salafi_Online: i asked Dr Saleh Saleh( by the way student of the Late shaykh 'Uthaymin) concerning our little argument! Salafi_Online: salamu alaykum wa rahmatullahi wa baarakatu, Oh Shaykh it is from the manhaj of the salaf to overthrow a rule who commits kufr al asghar? fairness-1: NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Salaf mate you didn't ask the right question. If I were you this is how I would phrase the questions: 1. salamu alaykum wa rahmatullahi wa baarakatu, Oh Shaykh if we know it improves the situation of Muslims it is from the manhaj of the salaf to overthrow a rule who commits kufr al asghar or not ? 2. How can an act of Kufr be considered as 'lesser evil', and what is worse than an act of Kufr? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Salafi_Online Posted October 26, 2004 if we know it improves the situation of Muslims it is from the manhaj of the salaf to overthrow a rule who commits kufr al asghar or not ? 2. How can an act of Kufr be considered as 'lesser evil', and what is worse than an act of Kufr? Ayub maybe its just me, but why would anyone wish to overthrow a ruler if they know it will not improve their situation but make it worst? what you mean with the second question, because like i said, if a ruler committs kufr and is labelled is a kafir, you can overthrow him if you have the means and as long as it doesnt leave to a greater evil! what is worst then an act of kufr? nothing; because kufr alkbar removes you from islam! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AYOUB Posted October 26, 2004 Originally posted by Salafi_Online: if a ruler committs kufr and is labelled is a kafir, you can overthrow him if you have the means and as long as it doesnt leave to a greater evil! So rulers survives no matter what they do, as long as they promise 'hell' if anyone dares to romove them. Bother can you explain why you posted this in a different thread sometime earlier? " [13]: We do not deem it correct to revolt against the Muslim rulers as long as they are Muslims, nor do we feel that revolutions bring about reconciliation. Rather, they corrupt the community. As for the rulers of Aden, then we feel that fighting them is obligatory, until they repent from heresy, Socialism and calling people to the worship of Lenin and Marx and other than these two from those who professed disbelief. " Topic: Sahal(salafi Hunter) this is for you! PS - Do you know where one could obtain the rulings of the scholars who oppose the presence of KAFIR troops in the holy lands? Thanks in advance. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
