iskudhexkaris.com ...

Iga dhaaf hadalka oo find it and post it here ,,, i really wanna see this xaaji. Is he Somali horta ??

Cadawga ugu weyn ee Somaliland waa Somalia waana in la iska jiraa oo loo fiirsadaa Hargeysa, (Qaran News)-Guddoomiyaha xisbiga mucaaridka ah ee UCID, Eng. Faysal Cali Waraabe, ayaa sheegay in cadowga kowaad ee madax banaanida Somaliland ka soo horjeedaa ay yihiin Somaalid. Waxa kale oo uu sheegay in dadka reer somaaliland ay yihiin dad hurda oo aan u soo jeedin ilaalinta nabadgalyada,islamarkaana dadka ajaanibka ah ayaynaan iska aaminin oo aynu si adag isaga baadhno markay madaarada iyo meelaha kale dalka ka soo galayaan. Guddoomiyaha UCID, wuxuu sidaasi ka sheegay Mar uu maanta kormeer ku tagay Madaarka caalamiga ah ee Cigaal International iyo cisbitaalka guud ee Magaalada Hargeysa. “ waxaa la leeyahay dadkii wax qarxiyay waxay ka soo dageen madaarka, waxaad ogaataan in cadowgeena koowaad uu yahay Soomaali, cadowgeenu ma aha Xabashi iyo Kukuuyo, balse kuwaas inoo eeg eeg horena diirka inooga saaray ee intay Guryaheena inaga saareen dadkeeniina isku xidh-xidhay , ayaynu iska ilownay waar sowkii shalay uun ina dilayay waa kii uun’e miyuu is bedelay.”Ayuu yidhi Guddomiyaha UCID. Guddoomiyuhu wuxuu sheegay inay dadka Somaalida qaarkood laga dhaadhiciyay in Somaliland Gaallo tahay,waxaanu yidhi “Qaar baa marka quraanka la barayo ee ay Al-Xamdu marayaan lagu yidhaahdaa Somaliland waa Gaallo, waxaan leeyahay kooxahaasi u tagi maynee ilaahay qaar ka shar badan ha ku salido.” Guddoomiyaha UCID wuxuu sidaasi ka sheegay Mar uu maanta kormeer ku tagay Madaarka caalamiga ah ee Cigaal International iyo cisbitaalka guud ee Magaalada Hargeysa. Eng. Faysal Cali Waraabe, oo la hadlayay masuuliyiinta iyo Hawl-wadeenada Madaarka Hargeysa, wuxuu yidhi “Madaarka waxaad u baahan tihiin meelo sida Tarajayga u samaysan lagu soo wareejiyo madaarka, waxaanad u baahan tihiin rag khabiiro ku ah ilaalada madaarada ogaadana in meelaha ay ku hamiyayaan ay ka mid yihiin Madaarada dalku.” Eng. Faysal Cali Waraabe, wuxuu hawl wadeenada Madaarada kula dardaarmay inay xil weyn iska saaraan sugida ammaanka dhabada diyaaradaha. Sidoo kale, Guddoomiyuhu wuxuu booqday cisbitaalka guud ee magaalada Hargeysa, halkaasi oo soo eegay dadkii ku dhaawacmay sadexdii qarax ee is miidaaminta ahaa ee ka dhacay Magaalada Arbacadii todobaadkii hore, waxaanu dadkii dhaawaca ahaa uu ilaahay uga baryay inuu shaafiyo.

looool ,, where in the youtube ?? ,, do some qarxis niyow Ilaahay ha kaa jisaa'i siiyee ,,

Hayee bal ha i sheegsheegin uun hadhow ,,,

markaad roodhi, jacayl iyo xorriyad isku dhuuqdo ayaynu taa ka wada hadli. Try it first.

loooooooooooool@way duushay ,,, mayee way Qaraxday ,,,,

anigu way dhaqaaqday ma idhaahdo ,, come on ,, waan dhaqaajiyaa uun ,,

looooooool ,, xunjuf ma isagaa af soomaali iyo ingiriisi midna yaqaan ,, i wonder wuxuu ku hadlo horta ,, loooooooooool@qaraxii hargeysaa wax u dhimay.

Only Females with High IQ and Beauty Need To Apply Outsourcing takes on a new twist: Single men and their “partners” are hiring egg donors, providing sperm and paying surrogates mothers to give birth to their desired offspring. SO YOU KNOW ALL THERE is to know about outsourcing, right? Think again. A new word has been added to the outsourcing vocabulary. Outsourcing is no longer just for the fortune 500 companies. ”Personalized businesses ”as well as reproductive business can be outsourced, to developing countries—all in the name of cheap labor, liberal Laws and availability of surrogate mothers and egg donors. We’ve heard about jobs going to India and China. Well, here is an even more imposing twist on outrageous - outsourcing; which is beginning to enter into a new frontier with deadly social and legal consequences and unanswered ethical questions: More well-off bachelors from Europe and U.S are going to India in droves for “medically designed” babies through surrogacy. Who says a man needs a female to have a baby? The story is told of, a 50- year old professor who, allegedly broke up his four- year relationship with his girlfriend and decided to try to have a child on his own--through surrogacy. In the U.S, the news of male partners from Israel, Europe or the U.S going to India to seek surrogate mothers for their “babies” abound. Is Ghana going to get a piece of the” pie”? At first glance, there might not seem to be a connection between “surrogacy outsourcing” and Ghanaian society but, let’s dissect its social significance and economic and legal implications. Imagine this scenario just a moment. I know this is a fantasy, but play along with me for a moment: Janet Asanatewaa, a 20 year –old adorable, attention-grabbling with traffic-stopping beauty is a second year student in one of our universities, who drives a brand new, Mercedes SUV and possesses the latest, smallest and thinnest electronic gadgets in town. So far as her friends can tell, she has no job and doesn’t deal in drugs. She claims to be a high- caliber born –again, cross-wearing Christian; with all the trimmings—a frequent visitor at prayer camps. In fact, she has acquired an enviable texture of reputation among her contemporaries, so much so that few of them began to question their own destiny and roles on this planet. That is why her sudden wealth and socio-economic mobility status have become the talk-of-the-town. Her friends’ suspicion grew when she became pregnant without naming the father of the baby. To make matters worse, that wasn’t her first pregnancy either. But, she has no baby of her own at home. What was wrong with that picture? Well, as it turned out, she’s surrogacy profiteer who seeks more “clients” to support her posh lifestyle. She has turned her womb into a cottage industry-- ---by delivering babies for money. In other words, she gets pregnant for gay men for money. That can not happen is Ghana. Right? Wait! It all has to do with Globalization. The fact of the matter is this hundred- ton ‘”gorilla” (globalization) is making nations without borders; the notion of citizenship and traditional community becomes obsolete in a commercial sense. Therefore, what happens else where around the world can be duplicated in Ghana easily. Big time. Warning: You’re about to read about an outrageous enterprise being nurtured in the medical marketplace in India; which could have a deadly social consequence on other side of the Atlantic---Ghana. It’s called REPRODUCTIVE OUTSOURCING. I’m not being melodramatic. I think you get the picture. Globalization has made Ghana very receptive to anything-- including economic or social trend. The question is: Do we have the judgment and the temperament to withstand all the forces coming from every angle? And, how long will it take that business to catch on in Ghana? Not, long—trust me! With our take-no-prisoners and cut-throat approach to our quest for money--by any means necessary--- it won’t be long before we latch onto the reproductive outsourcing ; If you don’t believe me let’s step back in time. Go and rewind your memory and see how long it took us to copy the gay and Lesbian lifestyles. How long did it take us to copy the“419” scam? Do I need to go on? Ghanaians can easily copy anything –to the extreme-- as long as they get direct dividend from it---that includes money, material things, fame and social status. As shocking as it may be to you, some women in Ghana would rent their wombs for money, regardless of the social or legal implication. In India, this new enterprise, known as “Reproductive Outsourcing”, has been flourishing beyond its borders. Clinics provide the surrogate and the donor mothers for the foreign future parents—who are taking advantage of Indian’s skilled medical professionals, relatively liberal laws and low price tags--- to have “medically desired babies”. This is how it works: Through Indian Clinics, foreign “couples”—usually gay (men) -- from the United States and Europe, specify the type of egg donor and the surrogate mother from pictures and their profiles via e-mail. Then when both parties agree, the selected fetus –which was formed from the man’s sperm and the female donor’s egg—is surgically implanted into the womb of a surrogate mother. No direct contact between the egg donor, the surrogate mother and the future parents of the baby is permitted. And, no sex is permitted. Thank you! You feel better now? The next or final stage is when the baby is born and she/he is delivered to the “parent”. The entire procedure costs about thirty -thousand dollars—which is one- third of the typical price in the United States. The surrogate mother usually gets a fee of $7500.00 for her services. And the clinics and other attorney’s fees take the major part of the money. The substance of this medical tourism-surrogate –outsourcing is that it’ is loaded with ethical, social and legal uncertainties which could generate very serious repercussion in our part of the world. And, that is a concern. In our part of the world I wonder what Opanyin Kwasi Manu would think when the news is broken to him that his only beautiful daughter, Yaa Wusua, who just graduated from Accra Polytechnic is having a baby for two men for a fee. The question is: How many young women will be able to resist the temptation? How many women will do everything and anything to engage in the “trade” just for the money? And, is our legal system strong and matured enough to withstand the fallout? Take our cash-strapped society for example; a womb-for- Rent enterprise would not only create the potential for exploitation of poor women but it could break marriages and tear families apart. Wouldn’t a young unmarried Ghanaian lady rather rent her womb for several thousand dollars than raising her own family? It would be hard for women to resist the temptation to rent their wombs when they could make money to start a business, finance a family member’s education or put up a house or engage in lavish lifestyle. How could one say “no” to a business which will guarantee two square meals a day, not to mention material things and money to burn? And, if the lady is married would the ego-driven Ghanaian husband be able to swallow his pride to let the wife get involved without accusing her of any “hanky- panky “?Are you sure that is not going to puncture a hole in the secured ego of the Ghanaian men? Another bad side of this enterprise is that it will most likely discriminate against women with less education and less natural beauty. After all, who wants to have a Xerox -copy of an unattractive woman? The issue here is: The Ghanaian government should put an advance protection in place for the surrogate motherhood and regulate the “industry” to monitor the frame work and its boundaries before the entire industry is hijacked by greedy middle men and women.. By so doing the government could easily prevent back- door dealings. Hey; “if we can’t beat them we must as well join them”. I’m not being fastidious. I’m just trying to be a realistic here. Would the government be able to prevent this enterprise from taking root in Ghana? Your guess is as good as mine. But, with our past history about money and greed I won’t bet on it. The financial payoff is awesome. Once people begin to smell the money the ethics and other social taboos would be thrown out of the window, all in the name of personal interest and cold cash. Money talks, folks! The fact is, the aroma of cold cash would be incentive enough to lure even much disciplined, Christian and conservative women to fall for this womb –for –rent business. So trying to prevent it is like preventing Ghanaians from migrating to foreign lands. As long as they will make money, they’re willing to pay the price because to them the price will be “right”. Money is an addictive drug and it can distort and corrupt the perception of politicians, pastors, police officers, publishers of bibles, Born –again Christians, housewives, surrogate mothers and students. Would the money as an incentive increase the divorce rate? Possibly. But, that will be another issue the social scientists will have to sort it out in the future. In a “conservative society” like ours, surrogacy arrangement which relies heavily on e-mail, ultrasound images of the developing embryo, beauty and IQ--- in the selection of the egg donors-- is very hard to stomach. But, we will get used to it in a matter of time, especially when the temptation is so strong to resist and the reward is very attractive. Gee, why didn’t I think of that? Welcome to the 21st century reproductive arena: Finally, men think they can have babies on their own---without women. But, they still have to go back to the drawing board; with a huge price tag. It’s not easy to switch things around. We can’t outsmart Mother Nature. Or can we? Time will tell. Well, I really do not want to sugarcoat this serious subject with religious or moral connotations. However, I ‘m curious as to how it’s going to resonate in our part of the world without causing any social friction. What do you think? Kwaku Adu-Gyamfi NJ, USA

I always think of giving a try when it comes to this green card but always lazy to do so. markay lacag i waydiiyaan uun buu wadnuhu i soo go'ayaa ,,,

Oo maxaad ahayd ??

Have you ever heard of MUTHB MUTHAB in Arabic ?? or in the Hadith ? I would like to call you that only if you know what it means ........... Meel ku adkayso niyow go'aan baa la yeeshaa oo Ilaahay nin buu kaa dhigaye.

Adiguna Alshabaab baad ka hadlaysaa xilligaas ,,

I like sidaad u galgalato marka garta lagaa leeyahay ,,,,, Ok ,, Next time ..

loooool ... I don't care if Obama is the president or not ,, after all it is America's president and nothing will change in Africa or the Muslim world. That is if they allow him to be a president which i too much doubt it.

You are messing it up sxb .... Democracy is not Shura (i mean only Shura) but as you said it is the rule of the people. How about if the people want the Quran to be edited and the majority are demanding that ???

wuxuu doonaba ha noqdo lakin maanta ma og tahay hadii cid kasta la dhiibo in cid ka daaya odhanaysaa jirin cid ku farxaysa mooyaane, sababtuna waa waxay nimankaasi sameeyeen iyo dadkay laayeen. Inkaar bay qabaan ,,

That is the problem when you are 100s of miles away and do assumptions just like that. You need to realize the real thread and this will strengh the government's actions sxb and no one will oppose now even if they hand over everybody. Ma waxbay tareen mise wax bay sii kharribeen ?

Redka, imikaba adigaa nimankaa inoogu yeedhaye bal waakaase ka sittee ....... sow kumaan odhan sharka looma yeedhee inaga daa ?

Akam jirtee ? Fayaan qabtee ??

looooooooooooooooooool@say Walaahi ,,, Waa runtii, that quesion is always there and once you say Walaahi ,, ehem ,, een , ehem ,, yaa sheegi kara dee.

On 29/10 a deplorable act of inhumane atrocity was committed against the peace loving nation of Somaliland. It has been the first time in the history of the country such unprecedented suicide bombers struck in the country’s soil. The attack was not merely a symbolic act on randomly selected places. It was meant to inflict maximum damage to innocent civilians. Twenty-two people were killed and over thirty others injured when three coordinated suicide bombers hit three symbolic sites, the Presidential Palace, Ethiopian Embassy and the UNDP headquarters. As the debris flew in every direction in the aftermath of the powerful and horrific explosions, so now do speculations and explanations of the possible motives of the perpetrators fly around. Many see the bombings as a grim reminder of the common threat Somalilanders face. Some even went further to suggest that suicide bombers visited the city as if the aerial bombings and indiscriminate shelling we witnessed in the late eighties by the then military regime of Siad Barre was not enough. Surely it has come at a time when voter registration and identification was in full swing. For the ordinary public an important question is not who was behind the bombings, because this is a matter for the country’s national security agency to deal with, but most relevant question is what motives did these bombers have? What scores, if any, were they trying to settle? What political message, if they had one, were they trying to communicate? And above all why try to bring anarchy to a country that is at peace with its neighbours? These are the questions many are searching answers for. No one claimed responsibility. In the absence of any group to claim responsibility for these crimes, only those who put together this evil project and those who executed it can answer these questions. Whatever else they wanted to achieve, they surely have succeeded but in one thing: throwing the people of Somaliland together. Both in the public and in the political spheres Somalilanders felt the same abhorrence. Spontaneous condolences for the victims and condemnation of this terrorist act poured in from the Diasporic Somaliland community. Inside the country, in Borama and Burao people took to the streets, showed their tribute to the victims of the senseless bombings, rallied behind their government - true patriotism in working. The President, Mr Dahir R. Kahin, as calm as always, addressed the nation to be vigilant. Opposition party leader, Mr. Mohamoud A. Mohamed and Mr. Faisal Ali Warabe showed their solidarity with the government. Somalilanders are mourning, but are resolute to stick together and to stick to their Islamic and democratic values is all but strengthened. Quick investigation led to locating the houses where those vicious perpetrators were architecting their bombs. In search for answers Somalilanders, though, need to be very economical with wild speculations; particularly if such guessworks have immediate implications for the innocent refugees from neighbouring Somalia and Ethiopia who in their thousands found save sanctuary in this peaceful nation in an otherwise troubled region. In my view three explanations could be identified: - There are those who think that the suicide bombers were ‘Islamic extremists’. - A second possible explanation is that the bombers were ‘Somali anarchists’. - A third explanation is that the bombers were ‘home-grown light-headed fanatics’ who served either or both of the above two. As for the first explanation, the point I want to make is to contest its validity. It seems to me we are forcing a false link between Islam and suicide bombings. In my view people who committed such act have had no Islamic agenda. In fact they could have Islamic agenda. To me it would be wrong to call them Islamic suicide bombers, because to call them so is not only to link the Islamic teachings with terrorism, but it also has further implications for all muslims – that every muslim is by definition potentially capable of committing such crimes. I do not think that this is what we mean when we call them islamists. To me these criminal butchers called their claim to Islam into question when they conspired against fellow muslims. And they ceased to be muslims soon as they implemented their vicious plans. The $100.000 question then is whether such people deserve Islamic burial (washing, clothing, and performing prayers on their bodies and souls)? This is a question of deeply moral implications which we cannot answer in any simplistic way. But we might answer it this way. To begin with, one can argue that the bombers did not adhere to the fundamental tenets and values of the Islamic religion. In this specific situation: the sanctity of human life. Killing innocent people, we all agree, is incompatible with the teachings of Islam, neither for that matter, the teaching of any other faith. Surely killing innocent people is not a short cut to heavens as many would suggest who either call themselves jihadists or are so called. Jihad, as one of the most misconceived conceptions in modern history of Islam, is not applicable here. Rather such cowardly act, I guess, is the highway to hellfire. So let us call spade a spade. They might have been (ex) muslims, but surely they did not die muslims. Neither could they have been Christians or Hindus for that matter. Eternal hellfire awaits them. If the second explanation is true, and it does have all the hallmarks to be so, it would be helpful that would-be butchers take note of the fact that over the past 18 years or so Somaliland has succeeded to develop the political skill needed to deal with such situations. Somaliland has not been just fortunate to have escaped anarchy and insecurity. Rather it was the result of stringent security measures and relentless focus on the peace and stability. It has stood the test of time for the best part of the last two decades. And such cowardly action cannot shake its faith in peace maintenance, nation building and securing international recognition. Whilst the Somaliland government is not fighting and should not fight the same war as Somalia’s TFG, and it is not high time for it to get involved in the internal politics of that nation [somalia], the majority of Somalilanders do not condone Ethiopian involvement in Somalia. At its best most of them see it as patronizing and at worst as an occupation. So whilst many Somalilanders do not think that Ethiopia is doing a benevolent job in Somalia and those who are fighting for a right cause should deal with their problem in their soil, the presence of a diplomatic and commercial Embassy in Hargeisa could in no way be seen in the same light as the occupying forces in Somalia. There are more Somalilanders in Ethiopia than vice versa. There are also historic commercial link and strategic political relations between the two countries which Somaliland should protect at all time for its own interest. Anarchists fail to see the complexity of such relation between the two nations. An important character of anarchist is that he is a two-dimensional demon: friend or foe. Somalilanders do not see their relations with Ethiopia this way. If the attack was not the work of anarchist why was the UNDP headquarters targeted? What political motivation, other than senseless anarchism, would someone have to attack a humanitarian organisation? Let us put this in a little wider perspective. In the past few months there was a wave of assassinations, assassination attempts and kidnapping of staff, both local and expatriates, working for relief agencies in Somalia – organisations that feed and treat the most vulnerable. Similarly in Ethiopia charity organisations were targeted, as it also happened in Somaliland few years ago. Attacking relief missions is fighting inhumanitarian war for evil causes. Surely these people are anarchist and their message reads: don’t feed them, don’t feed us. Such desperation, far from Islamic teachings, is worrying. As for the second explanation though, we have to be careful with drawing generalised conclusion; because ‘anarchists’ are historically always in the minority. They know no borders. What they have in common is that they cannot stand stability, order, and peace. They link up with like-minded people, and this is if the third explanation is true, to destroy other people’s dreams. The only generalisation we can make is to be vigilant at all times. So what next? In my view for the best interest of the region it is now high time for the TFG, the ARS (both wings) or any other significant body in Somalia to start coming to terms with the political reality on the ground. They should, I think, quickly have to consider the recognition of Somaliland’s sovereignty – two state solution, if you like. Only then can the problem of anarchist elements be uprooted from the region. Mohamed Obsiye, London

Ma maskax baa jirta nin calooshu dhuuriyaasayso ,,,,,