Xaaji Xunjuf;704403 wrote: Gaalkacyo:Koox hubaysan oo weerar khasaaro geystay ku qaaday gaari Rakaab ah oo marayey inta u dhaxaysa Galinsoor & Gaalkacyo. 22. marts 2011 waxaanan weli la garan ujeedada weerarkan gaariga dadweynaha lagu qaaday,iyadoo ay taasi kamid noqonayso weerar isdabajoog ah oo gaadiidka dadweynaha ay kuqaadaan kooxo isbaarooyin badani ay u yaalaa deegaano kamid ah Mudug koonfurteeda & Galguduud. XX is lashing out due to the failure of the secessionists and their main asset Amira Zubayra who he adores greatly. In his anger he confuses the road between Galinsoor & Galkacyu to the city, and an attack on civilians as assasination of admin members? keep it up

Funny how the secessionist will no doubt cry again as they did with the historic accord signed in Garowe between Puntland & Galmudug..A new corridor must be opened from Beledweyne to Las Qoray.. Peace in our times.

the audacity of these SSC people. They are changing their voices to famous peoples..How dare they?

This is big news. How weak and pathetic the secessionist junta have become. Is this a government or one big Marfish?

^^Indeed, bortherly and unionists who want to see a return of the Somali republic.

^^^well said sis. These men should pay a heavy price for their callous actions.

Welcome back Paragon.

It is a most welcome development. Now bring on board the Ahlu Sunna groups and things are looking up. Well done

Wednesday, 23 March 2011 Isn't it marvellous that all these governments are determined to do "something" about Colonel Gaddafi? For example Hillary Clinton said she supported military action once the Arab League – made up of countries such as Bahrain, Syria, Yemen and Saudi Arabia – backed the air strikes. And it is encouraging that the policy of not tolerating a dictator has the backing of so many dictators. Some people might suggest that one way King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, for example, might reduce the number of Arab dictators, would be to stop being an Arab dictator, but that's because they don't understand how complicated these things can be. But presumably, once Gaddafi's been dealt with, these dictators will back a UN resolution to bomb themselves, declaring, "The international community can no longer sit back and watch me trample on my own people, so I must be stopped. I give myself three days to recognise the opposition and call elections, otherwise I will assist Nato in bombing myself. Or maybe I should assist them, as they've sold me so many of their weapons they can't have many left." Others will say the West might now turn a blind eye to repression that happens in countries which have backed the bombing of Libya, but that would mean an American government has bombed somewhere without being honest about its motives, and that would be highly cynical. For example, Hillary's comments about the need to act once the Arab League asked for help explain why no government helped Gaza when it was attacked two years ago. Because Gaza obviously forgot to ask. It's a bit shy, I suppose, and didn't want to be any trouble. But the person to be most sorry for is Tony Blair, who must feel like one of these people who get interviewed when their neighbour's gone berserk and shot everyone in the shopping centre. Tony will make a statement soon that goes "I knew Mr Gaddafi for years. He just kept himself to himself, I had no idea he'd end up like this. I even had my photo taken with him after selling him dozens of tanks – who'd have guessed he'd use them for military reasons? I'm shocked." The main argument for the bombing seems to be that we have to do something. This suggests that up until now we've been doing nothing, which is true if you don't count drawing the boundaries of Arab countries in the first place, installing an assortment of Kings and helping them to fire on anyone who objected, backing every Israeli invasion, arming the Shah, arming and financing a list of dictators as long as they sent us their oil, invading Iraq and then making Tony Blair the Middle-East poxy sodding peace envoy, to give his job its full title. This may explain why most Arabs are reluctant to welcome Western backing, and why they might reply to a question from Britain and America that went "Can we just do nothing?" by answering, "Why don't you give it a go? For about a hundred years. Then we'll see how we're getting on and get back to you". So while the people of Benghazi must have been relieved that the UN has forced Gaddafi back, it must be in the same way that if you were being attacked by robbers you'd be relieved to see the Mafia turn up and fire on them. Then afterwards you'd have a new problem, that you owed them something. And that might be the aim of the governments involved in the bombing. Because none of them have ever seemed bothered whether the regimes in the Middle East are democratic, or brutal, as long as they're happy to trade their oil on favourable terms. They want to make sure that whatever emerges from these rebellions, there are rulers who will carry on with that arrangement. Or maybe Britain and America have got that feeling you get at a fairground when you can't knock the tins off the shelf with the little spongy ball. It looks so easy, so after each attempt you hand over another pound and say, "Right. One more go. Surely I'll get it right this time. Here goes. Whoops!"

Thanks for the heads up sis.

Gaddafi vows he will never surrender and rails against 'crusade on Islam' By Kunal Dutta Wednesday, 23 March 2011 Just as the world had started to wonder why the Libyan leader had not been seen in a week, Muammar Gaddafi appeared on the balcony of his encampment near Tripoli and made a defiant speech to his supporters, saying that Western intervention in his country was "unjust" and would be defeated in the end. Appearing on Libyan state television and displaying the same fiery temperament that has become a signature trademark of his recent addresses, the Libyan leader denounced the coalition's bombing attacks, saying that the country would "never surrender" and that they would be beaten whether in the "long or short term". The three-minute broadcast – brief by Colonel Gaddafi's usual standards – beamed onto Libyan television screens and filtered out across the world as a fourth night of anti-aircraft fire lit up the night skies in Tripoli. Related articles •Gaddafi's forces: Bombed but not broken •Villagers who greeted downed US airmen are 'strafed by friendly fire' •Regime takes its revenge on rebels after night of destruction •Cameron: What looked like a triumph is beginning to seem a curse •The human cost: 'We cannot treat them here – but we have no ambulances' •Sarkozy: A leader losing friends at home and abroad •Arab League: Support back on board, but consensus remains far from firm •Partition: Dividing Libya in two may be rebels' best hope •Nato's bombing of Serbia presents lessons for the assault on Gaddafi •Mark Steel: It's Blair I feel really sorry for •Adrian Hamilton: The end of the world as we know it •Letters: Military action in Libya Search the news archive for more stories Regime figures in Tripoli had until now kept tight-lipped about his whereabouts, fuelling speculation that he had fled, while his appearances on state television had become sporadic since 22 February, when he was seen outside a ruined building in Tripoli, sheltering under a huge umbrella and denouncing reports that he had fled to Venezuela. Last night, it was not clear whether the latest broadcast was filmed live, though foreign reporters in Tripoli were told that the speech was delivered from the residential compound in Bab Al-Aziziya, the same one that was hit by a cruise missile on Sunday night. Dressed in black and clutching a microphone, Col Gaddafi branded his enemies "crazed fascists" and called for "all Islamic armies" to join him. He described the West's attacks as the "new crusader battle launched by crusader countries on Islam". He added: "There are demonstrations everywhere against this unjustified assault, which breaches the United Nations' charter... This assault... is by a bunch of fascists who will end up in the dustbin of history." His speech was signed off by a series of fireworks in the Libyan capital. Crowds of supporters cheered – some waving their flags in defiance and others shooting bullets into the air in celebration. The appearance caught many of his critics by surprise, but the US was keen to play the incident down. Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, went on record to ABC News, saying that Col Gaddafi could be exploring "exile options". "Some of it is theatre," Ms Clinton told ABC News in an interview, saying the United States was aware of people reaching out, "allegedly on Gaddafi's behalf", to try to assess their options. "A lot of it is just the way he behaves – it's somewhat unpredictable," Ms Clinton added. "But some of it, we think, is exploring. You know: what are my options? Where could I go? What could I do. And we would encourage that." But this latest display of bravado on state television at such a crucial moment for allied operations, suggested that exile was the last thing on the Libyan leader's mind. "I am staying here, my home is here," he said defiantly. "I am staying in my tent."

Gaddafi's forces: Bombed but not broken As dictator stands firm, Britain lowers its expectations of 'victory' The Western allies yesterday struggled to find a coherent strategy in Libya as Colonel Muammar Gaddafi's forces renewed attacks on rebel strongholds despite a no-fly zone and a fourth day of allied strikes against government military targets. In Washington, top officials insisted the US intended to hand over command of the operation to its allies within days, but wrangling within Nato continued yesterday along with confusion over what the mission was increasingly clear that despite the scale of the damage inflicted on Colonel Gaddafi's forces, the rebels were highly unlikely to achieve a military victory. In London, a Government minister acknowledged the crisis could end in stalemate, and partition of the country. "A stable outcome where they weren't killing each other would, in a sense, be one way of achieving the humanitarian objective," the armed forces minister Nick Harvey told the BBC. At the same time, he went further than any British minister yet and refused to rule out the deployment of British forces on the ground, claiming there was a clear distinction between sending in a full-scale occupation force – explicitly barred by the UN Security Council's Resolution 1973 – and a more limited operation. Asked how long Britain would be involved in the military operation in north Africa he replied: "How long is a piece of string? We don't know how long this is going to go on for." President Barack Obama, who last night cut short a trip to Latin America to return to Washington, called key leaders to try to agree a co-ordinating command role for the alliance and reduce the risk of the US becoming bogged down in another war in a Muslim country. According to US officials, the heavy "front-end" phase of the intervention will soon be over, with the main objectives achieved. Officials in France and Britain have been working on a plan to pass political control of the campaign to a "committee" of states providing military support to the no-fly zone but with operational control being run under the Nato command structure. This would be backed up by a wider international "Contact Group on Libya" – similar to the one set up to deal with the aftermath of the Kosovo conflict. This would be at foreign-minister level and would include countries not included in the "no-fly" coalition. It would be charged with examining the "whole shape and nature of the on-going crisis", a Government source said. It would also be expected to have a role in any post-Gaddafi political reconstruction in Libya. The three-pronged plan is intended to defuse a dispute over the medium-term political leadership of the anti-Gaddafi coalition. The US, Britain and others want the campaign to be run by Nato, but Turkey and Germany oppose this. Last night, there was no sign the heavy Western bombardment had shifted the balance decisively in favour of the poorly armed anti-Gaddafi forces. Libyan government forces were fighting back last night on the eastern front line near the key city of Ajdabiya. The counter-attack followed the failure of rebel forces to take the city on Sunday despite air attacks having destroyed regime tanks and artillery. By yesterday evening, there were reports that the regime's troops were moving south once again to threaten the route to Tobruk and the Egyptian border. US Admiral Samuel J Locklear, the on-scene commander of allied forces, confirmed last night that civilians were under attack by government forces in Misrata, Libya's third-largest city. The coalition was "considering all options", he said. In Washington, complaints were growing yesterday from some Democrats as well as Republicans – with some saying the US was doing too little, others that the President was dragging the country into a costly conflict without properly consulting Congress. But Mr Obama himself has only added to the uncertainty by reiterating the US still wanted Col Gaddafi to leave power, although the formal goal of the intervention was merely to protect Libya's civilian population. In one encouraging sign for Washington and London however, two Qatari fighter jets arrived at a Greek base on Crete yesterday. This brings nearer the direct Arab involvement in enforcing the no-fly zone that the US has been seeking to dispel the impression of another solely Western onslaught against a Muslim country,. The French Foreign Minister, Alain Juppé, told the French parliament yesterday that a compromise deal would see a "political steering group" of coalition foreign ministers plus the Arab League take over political direction of the air campaign. Mr Juppé said the idea had been accepted by Britain and others and that the first meeting of foreign ministers would take place in Paris, London or Brussels in the "next few days". It was not immediately clear whether the US would participate in this group. Avoiding a straightforward "Nato" political label is crucial, France argues, because the Arab world is hostile to the Atlantic alliance. It would also be politically cumbersome because of the opposition to the Libyan operations by Germany, Turkey and other Nato members. There is also an unspoken reason for French reluctance to hand over the campaign to Nato: Mr Sarkozy hopes to wring all the domestic political advantage he can from prolonging France's leading role in the Libyan operations. The British Government too was last night involved in a round of frantic diplomatic activity to patch together a new coalition to take over policing the Libyan no-fly zone, as David Cameron spent much of the afternoon in talks with the Saudi Arabian Foreign Minister, in an attempt to persuade the Kingdom to provide symbolic financial support. Apart from Qatar, no Arab state has committed military forces to the no-fly zone but British government sources said they were hopeful that other Middle Eastern countries – in particular the United Arab Emirates – would be prepared to provide support to operations even in a minor way. "What we are looking at essentially is a Nato-plus coalition rather like we have with Isaf in Afghanistan," one British official said.

It's a great development and more needs to be done to address local concerns in this region.

^^^You write as if you have a say in this news?

^^^Funny that Abdirahman Tuur the founding father of "Somaliland" ended up a stooge for Aydeed and a refugee in his Villa. If you hate Ethiopia so much, why cry for them to liberate Buhudle for you, and whu compose love letters to Melez Zanawi? Come on people.

^^^Why should we take you seriously for your devotion to Amira Zubayra and the gang?

^^^lol@ those who love Ethiopia most complaining about Ethiopia,. Who was it that said a child born in Addis is closer to me than one born in Mogadishu? Ah secessionists..Got to love them.

Siilanyo Gate is big..

Xaaji Xunjuf;704033 wrote: ^^ What's sir and he also said he spoke to garaad selebaan and garaad abshir and some other clan chiefs in buhoodle What on Earth got you so angry. Let me guess, that a mole could tape your whole "government" shows how weak and pathetic they are. Siilanyo is getting Mugged all over again

1. Warlord Siilaanyo - Wareysi Sir ah http://www.zshare.net/audio/880564009b3e5fb0/

This is great stuff.. Keep it up.

^^^Nah they grow chubby & move to Maimi..

Maadey is trying to be clever, poor lad.

Somalina, I am old enough dear..

Ali Abdalla Salah is on his way out..