Che -Guevara

Somalia rejects AU proposals to modify Amisom role

Recommended Posts

The Somali government has raised a new rift with troop contributing countries to a peacekeeping mission on its territory after it rejected proposals to modify the forces for an expanded role.

In a sweeping statement on Saturday, Somalia Government Spokesman Mohamed Moalimuu said Mogadishu had rejected in totality a report from the African Union (AU) which proposed four ways in which the African Union Mission in Somalia (Amisom) could be modified.

Moalimuu was referring to a report of the Independent Assessment Team on the African Union’s Engagement in and with Somalia post-2021 which came as Amisom nears the end of its extended mandate in Somalia which is due by December 2021.

“The Somali government held an inter-ministerial meeting to discuss the report and has rejected from the outset the report’s finding and recommendations and will issue a formal statement,” Moalimuu said.

While Somalia could be expected to table reasons behind the rejection, the move by Mogadishu signals an apparent disagreement with the five troop contributors to Amisom — Kenya, Djibouti, Ethiopia, Burundi and Uganda.

Multidimensional force

Earlier in the week, a technical team of experts from the five countries said they accepted the proposal to turn Amisom, which has been essentially a combat force, into a multidimensional force with a hybrid formation of AU and UN, which will work on total stabilisation of Somalia, including security, humanitarian and political rebuilding of the country.

“In the ensuing deliberations, the technical experts of the Amisom (Troop contributing Countries) TCCs observed that the containment of threats to peace and security in Somalia still existed,” the technical team said in a statement after meeting in Nairobi last Sunday.

“In particular, the technical experts regretted that Somalia had become a threat to international peace and security due to chronic instability in that country, a situation that had been worsened by and nourished the existence of terroristic elements in Somalia.”

The AU independent panel led by South African military officer, Maj-Gen Xolani Mankayi, proposed four options for Amisom ahead of the end of its mandate in December.

One option was to fully transition into an AU-UN multidimensional stabilisation mission deployed under Chapter 7 of the UN Charter on threats to global peace and security. The team said this will provide a “holistic approach, beyond the security and stabilisation process” which was Amisom’s initial mandate from the time it was created in 2007.

“The nucleus of the security components would be constituted by the contingents currently serving in Amisom, subject to assessment of their capabilities and would be augmented as necessary to respond to the new realities such as the opening of new sectors,” the report seen by the Nation says.
Right balance

“The mission will be constituted with the right balance of civilian, police and military capability, including a Rapid Strike Force (RSF), and intervention brigades tailored to the specific operational requirements of the Somalia environment, established following joint AU-UN strategic assessment, planning as well as collaborative decision making, together with representatives of potential troops and police contributing countries.”

The second option, the team proposed was to reconfigure Amisom into an AU multidimensional stabilisation support for Somalia, which will end the mission’s role as a combat force by including a stronger political component led by AU but coordinating with UN.  However, this could already face financial problems as there has been no regular source of funds beyond the UN’s.

The team said this option is only possible with “predictable and sustainable” funding derived from a UNSC authorised mandate under UN assessed contributions.

The third choice is for Amisom to turn into a regional standby force, based on AU’s security architecture. Traditionally, such an architecture has taken on standby forces created by regional economic blocs. This means the troop contributing countries could change to be specific from those countries who share a regional bloc with Somalia, as in the Intergovernmental Authority on Development. It means that countries in the region will have a sole duty of mobilising equipment needed to deploy such a force.

Exit Somalia completely

In the absence of all this, the AU team proposed that Amisom exits Somalia completely, which could take up to six months from December. It said this could be a result of broken trust between Amisom and Somalia’s federal government.

Somalia’s rejection of the report came as the AU team accused Mogadishu of frustrating its efforts to gather views on the future of Amisom. The federal government, the report charged, did not respond to inquiries until after the team had finalised the report which “sends a message that African Union involvement in Somalia is not welcomed by the political actors”.

In general, the AU team said Amisom’s role may still be needed, albeit with adjustments, given the continual lack of trust between the federal government and the federal member states.

It said Somalia’s lack of stabilisation is mostly a result of wrangles in the government which has seen the country miss targets to write a new constitution, share resources and power, as well as a delayed reform of the security forces. This, in addition to Amisom’s lack of capacity, threat of Al-Shabaab and the divergent interests of foreign partners, have conspired to slow down stabilisation, it said.

“Any future Amisom exit must be based on the (Somalia National Army) SNA’s capacity to protect the civilian population, to engage Al-Shabaab, to protect main supply routes and secure liberated territory.

“The AU-IA team believes that a premature withdrawal of Amisom would lead to a dramatic reversal of the progress achieved in Somalia during the last 14 years. The events of 25 April 2021, which were precipitated by the political impasse between FGS and some FMS, saw militias and some SNA allied to the opposition temporarily take over parts of Mogadishu,” it said, referring to a split back in April when the military took political sides as the country haggled on term extension for President Mohamed Farmaajo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
galbeedi   
1 hour ago, Che -Guevara said:

n the absence of all this, the AU team proposed that Amisom exits Somalia completely, which could take up to six months from December. It said this could be a result of broken trust between Amisom and Somalia’s federal government.

Their mandate ends December 2021, yet even six more months means trust had broken. The federal government has every right to have a say about the future deployment of these troops. 14 years is enough , they should leave.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, maakhiri1 said:

^If they leave, Taliban style will happen.

what is the core issue of dispute?

They want to deploy their occupying troops whereven Kiikuuyo desires to deploy. Case in point in Garbahaareey venue during the selection. Unfortunately, Jabuuti once again is sabataging Soomaali state by openly supporting them this latest Kiikuuyo stance.

Also being in Soomaaliya is a cash cow to milk from EU to these broke countries. 

I don't think what happened in Afgaanistaan can happen in Soomaaliya. What did AMISOM did actually do in the last three years than get overpaid and sleep in their camps? Nothing. They actually stopped engaging Barbaarta and deliberately evacuated many bases in Shabeellooyinka and Jubbada Hoose expecting to fall to them; did not happen and were immediately secured by Soomaali army and not kuwa afka duuban. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1/ Participated in the Africa Union Defence Ministers meeting addressing the African mission in Somalia, post January 2022, today. We agreed on the imperative to have a hybrid AU led UN mission in Somalia.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2/ with a multidimensional mandate & that is well resourced to address a range of activities that will transition Somalia to a secure country, at peace with its neighbors and contributing to international peace and security.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
galbeedi   
14 minutes ago, Miskiin-Macruuf-Aqiyaar said:

They actually stopped engaging Barbaarta

Agree. I haven't seen one single fire fight between Amisom and Al-Shabaab. The only area Al-shabaan could take over is JUbbaland area. I don't mind Kenya staying there until the capability of the national force grows and the political climate stabilizes. 

Ethiopia has already left, and Djibouti could transfer Hiiraan within a year to one of those Turkish trained forces.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Che -Guevara said:

a multidimensional mandate

Gentlemen,

Pay attention to those words, they not only want to take over security but also essentially set up a parallel government. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fact, 1, these guys don't want to leave SOMALIA  it is a massive cash cow, unbelieve money is made, , so they will do whatever necessary to stay.

Fact, 2, Somalis are not ready, it is not about military, it is basic governance,  capacity building,  policing, hospitals, digging wells,  investigation, security training etc I have been following what they do, and many things/skills they offer, are completely missing from SOMALIA, and SOMALIS are no where near ready, people who had skills either dead, retired, or left  the country.

The  most shocking part I noticed, is  they bring many gaas dhegoole,  Africans with no skills, and train and upskill  them in SOMALIA, and you wonder, how come Somalis are not imbedded, for knowledge transfer,  whether  mechanics, radio operators, technicians,  policing , etc !!! What is going ?, is lack of interest from Somalis, or lack of trust? Something is not right.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In meel la iska fadhiyo, badarkooda iska cunaan, mushaarkooda iska qaataan rabaan calool u shaqeystiyaasha AMISOM.

Khilaaf saameyn xun yeeshay oo ka dhex-taagan talisyada ciidanka xoogga iyo Amisom

Khilaaf xoog leh oo soo kala dhexgalay saraakiisha sare ee ciidanka xoogga dalka iyo kuwa AMISOM ayaa wiiqay howl-galladii ka dhanka ahaa Al-Shabaab ee ka socday gobollo uu ugu horeeyo Shabeellada Dhexe.

Barnaamijka Galka Baarista ee ka baxa VOA ayaa soo bandhigay in khilaafkaas uu qarxay markii ciidanka xoogga dalka ay howlgallo ka dhan ah Al-Shabaab ka bilaabeen deegaano ka tirsan gobolka Shabeellada Dhexe.

Sida uu barnaamijkaan u sheegay sarkaal ka tirsan militeriga Soomaaliya oo ku sugan Shabeellada Dhexe khilaafkan waxa uu qarxay markii ay ciidanka xoogga Soomaaliya bilaabeen howlgal aan lagu war-gelin AMISOM, kaas oo uu hoggaaminayey Taliyaha guud ee ciidanka xoogga dalka Jeneraal Odawaa Yuusuf Raage.

Intaas kadib waxaa la sheegay inuu qarxay khilaaf iyo kala aragti duwanaasho xoog leh uu u dhaxeeya saraakiisha ciidanka xoogga dalka iyo kuwa AMISOM, gaar ahaan kuwa Burundi oo ku sugan qeybo badan ka tirsan gobolka Shabeellada Dhexe.

Sidoo kale barnaamijkaan waxaa lagu soo bandhigay xogta ku qorneed warqado ay is dhaafsadeen talisyada SNA iyo AMISOM, kuwaas oo Taliska Militeriga Soomaaliya uu uga dacwoonayo ciidamada Burundi ee ku sugan Shabeellada Dhexe.

Tasliska militeriga Soomaaliya ayaa ciidanka Burundi ku eedeeyey inay Al-Shabaab madadaalinayaan, oo caajis badan uu ku jiro howlgallada naadirka ah oo ay sameeyaan.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
galbeedi   
On 7/18/2021 at 10:46 PM, maakhiri1 said:

Fact, 2, Somalis are not ready, it is not about military, it is basic governance,  capacity building,  policing, hospitals, digging wells,  investigation, security training etc I have been following what they do, and many things/skills they offer, are completely missing from SOMALIA, and SOMALIS are no where near ready, people who had skills either dead, retired, or left  the country

I think you have a point. The Somali police and those who are manning major places like airports are not up to the task or could be infiltrated by the enemy. A guy in Halane told me that the Ugandans at the check points are very serious and meticulous in their checking of vehicles and people. He said, we just passed a check point forgot something , and we turned around. They flowed the same protocol although the people and the vehicle were the same.

Also , you have a lot of people who were deputized and joined rhe security service . THese people have blood in their hands and couldn't be trusted to sensitive security. 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Amisom can't leave if they leave the fragile govt will be destroyed shabaab.. Galbeedi is very naive to think the ragtag militia will stand against the  alshabaab milltary. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.