African Union Urges Libya Dialogue

[Bashiir]

Addis Ababa — The Libyan government has agreed to a range of proposals from the African Union at a high level meeting held in Addis Ababa Friday, including democratic reforms and talks with the rebels.

 

"[Libya] is committed to a cease-fire," reads a statement issued in the Ethiopian capital at the end of the meeting, "and the international community should impose the same obligations on the other parties. [Libya] is also committed to an observer mission of the African Union to monitor the cease-fire."

 

Earlier in the week, African Union chief Jean Ping said the AU meeting aimed at coming up with a road map to resolve the crisis, including the formation of a transitional government, the holding of elections and the building of democratic institutions to meet the aspirations of all Libyans.

 

The meeting was attended by a wide range of interested parties, including the UK, France and other European countries that are part of the U.S.-dominated coalition carrying out air and naval strikes against Libyan government forces; the United Nations, which authorised a no-fly zone, an embargo and measures to protect civilians; Russia and China, which abstained from the vote on the U.N. resolution and have been critical of foreign military action thus far; and representatives of Libya's neighbours, such as Algeria.

 

Libyan leader Moammar Gaddafi sent a delegation led by Mohammad Al-Zawi, Speaker of the People's Congress, but the rebel Transitional National Council, crucially, declined to attend the meeting, demanding that Gaddafi's stepping down be placed on the agenda. Direct talks do not seem an immediate possibility.

 

Gaddafi's representatives said nearly a week of bombing had claimed hundreds of civilian lives.

 

"We demand the cessation of the air bombardment and the naval blockade carried out by Western forces and the United States, for the invalidity of its argument to protect civilians since it is killing them by the hundreds and is attacking and destroying our armed forces, and paving the way for the other side to attack," said al-Zawi.

 

Ping said the African Union is pushing for political reforms in Libya through dialogue, and called on all parties to immediately end hostilities, allow humanitarian workers to provide aid and protect all foreign nationals residing in the country.

 

The view from Africa

The civil war in Libya has provoked mixed reactions across Africa.

 

In Brazzaville, the government of the Republic of Congo has denounced the air and naval bombardment of Libya by the coalition. "We do not support the bombardments, and all that is taking place presently. We don't think this will produce a solution," Daniel Owassa, secretary general of Foreign Affairs, told IPS.

 

Congo is one of the five countries on the African Union panel formed earlier in March to establish a dialogue between the protagonists in Libya's civil war.

 

"The bombardment will prevent the panel from working - it must stop," said Owassa.

 

But Congolese public opinion is divided.

 

Roger Bouka Owoko, executive director of the Congolese Human Rights Observatory, is among those who approve the coalition's military action. "All those who condemn the bombing - beginning with Congo itself - are those who have eaten with Gaddafi. He's a bandit who has killed more than 10,000 people and there are heads of state who still support him. So those who are dead, are they dogs or rats?"

 

Mali is also a member of the AU panel. Though its government has not made a public statement on Libya, reaction in the street to air strikes in Libya has been powerful. Responding to a call from Islamist associations, thousands took part in a march supporting Gaddafi's regime in Bamako on Friday, chanting slogans against French president Nicholas Sarkozy and U.S. leader Barack Obama.

 

Support for Gaddafi from Malian Muslims is not by chance. "Gaddafi alone does more for Mali than the entire West," says Yacouba Berté, a resident of Bamako who did not hide his anger at the attacks. "He has built more than 300 Islamic schools and pays salaries for the teachers there."

 

Malians are strongly represented among the thousands of African migrants who the war has forced out of their homes in Libya, the widely-reported involvement of mercenaries from south of the Sahara on Gaddafi's side aggravating already-entrenched racism and discrimination against black Africans who have been threatened and attacked in rebel-held areas.

 

In Kampala, Ugandan Foreign Affairs Minister Henry Okello Oryem has addressed parliament on the implications of the Libyan war for safety of Ugandans living there, on regional peace and security, and confirmed that Libyan assets in Uganda will be frozen in line with U.N.

 

President Yoweri Museveni has condemned the airstrikes in a lengthy statement, and in a debate in parliament, General Elly Tumwine - Uganda's army is represented by its own members of parliament - described the coalition attacks as rape. "Anytime a powerful person humiliates a weak one is similar to rape," he said. "The methods used to reach to the decision were unprecedented in terms of the time, in terms of the participation, and more boldly and missing was the African participation."

 

This provoked protest from opposition MPs who said, pointedly, that the military action should be a warning against African leaders clinging to power or involved in human rights violations.

 

"If this House is going to condemn the Western world," said Uganda Peoples Congress MP Livingstone Okello Okello, "that condemnation will be without me. I cannot condemn people who are trying to save lives from somebody who is killing his own people, not even foreigners."

 

*Soumaïla Diarra in Bamako, Wambi Michael in Kampala and Arsène Séverin in Brazzaville contributed to this report.

 

Source: All Africa Online

[Bashiir]

In the wave of political change in the Arab world, Libya clearly stands apart. Unlike his counterparts in Egypt or Bahrain, Muammar Gaddafi’s power does not seem to be slipping out of his hands, and there’s a reason for it.

 

Gaddafi’s resilience looks really strange, when you start considering it. His domestic opposition is armed with machine guns, not stones and Molotov cocktails. Even after a period of thaw, his international reputation is still on a par with Kim Jong-il – with all the airliner bombings, killing of police officers in St. James’ Square and a WMD program in his bag. Now he even has an international military force in his backyard, which without doubt could take control of Libya in a matter of days, if such a decision was made.

 

With such pressure, any dictator would have been dethroned – if not by his own will, then with the friendly help of cautious subordinates. Yet that’s exactly what has not happened. Moreover, noticeably missing in reports from the country are the expected mass defection of government officials, troops and security forces to the opposition, and those voiced often turn out to be false, like that of Gaddafi’s daughter Ayesha allegedly attempting to flee to Malta.

 

The plain fact is that Colonel Gaddafi has the support of both the public and his own government. This certainly doesn’t make him “the good guy” in the story, but it casts a huge shadow on the whole “oppressed people gather to oust the hated dictator” scenario.

 

One has to remember that Libyan society is traditional and fundamentally fractionalized. Being in power in Libya is a balancing act between age-long blood feuds, traditions that prevail over rational thinking, the vital necessity to at least appear too strong to be defied, and a bunch of sons who are not eager to wait long before replacing you. All this is aggravated by the “oil pie” (of which everyone wants a bigger slice) and a small army of youths who are unlikely to find a job in a country which mostly consists of desert.

 

Gaddafi’s strategy involves hefty social benefits, mass education and a great degree of local self-governance within communities (his latest step to hand out arms to all civilians is actually a development of the ongoing situation, in which a major part of the army is in essence a well-armed militia). His supporters apparently believe that those benefits outweigh drawbacks like the public execution of political opponents or funding of international terrorism.

 

The bad thing about the position of a dictator is that as soon as you seem to have lost your grip, someone will try and replace you. And this is what happened in Libya in February. The stronghold of rebels is the region of Cyrenaica, dominated by the conservative religious order Senussi, with strong ties to Libyan Bedouins. They have never been fans of Gaddafi, with is natural once you take into account that he overthrew King Idris, who was also a hereditary leader of Senussi and emir of Cyrenaica. But for 40 years he managed to hold them in check through violence, bribes and intrigues.

 

Assuming that those people’s only desire is to live in a democratic state with an elected president would be highly optimistic. Assuming that they want a bigger share of the oil which happens to be in their territory is much more realistic. Believing that they’ll keep free schools and hospitals on the list of their priorities – well, that’s wishful thinking. In fact, their inability to organize themselves and the consequent general retreat from Gaddafi’s loyal troops is a good indication of what they would do if they are in power.

 

The biggest mystery is why on earth the international community would send a fleet to Libya to support one faction in an ordinary civil war. Is it so Sarkozy can score political points for being a tough guy ahead of the presidential election? Is it so Berlusconi can draw media attention away from his sex scandal? Is it so Obama can keep up with the tradition that each US president start a war? Judging from how slow the action is unfolding there, the people in charge don’t seem to have the answer themselves.

 

Courtesy: Aleksandre Antonov, RT

 

http://mizoramexpress.com/index.php/2011/03/libyan-uprising-is-not-%E2%80%9Cpeople-toppling-dictator/

[Bashiir]

Read here :

 

http://poorrichards-blog.blogspot.com/2011/03/libyan-war-and-control-of-mediterranean_27.html