****

Somalia, You clanniest wrote around 6 books , added the old fart into the somali educations system, told his stories on Radi Muqdisho for 40 years, built a statue for him, named an entire section of the somali armed forces after him , named schools, and airport after the old scounderal and thats not obsession?? and 1 book by an dude who refuted your garbage is an obession?? what a usless cheap weak argument,

Somalia, stop the whining , no clan ever cared much about writing a book about this mullah till now, it was you people who worshipped this cirminal and pradaed him in Radios, books, and even somali education system. Now when 1 clan author wrote a decent book about your lies you cry and whine and wail.

Idaajaa's book and aw Jaamca are not based on any research , no refernces, no citations , nothing , just a punch of poems and few clan stories vouched by few block old farts. Thats not a book of history thats a book of "his-stories."

Facts are facts boy , there is nothing you can do about , the book is well reasrched , well written and well recived, what do you have to refute the great writer Guri-Barwaaqo, you can't challenge him in anything , you are basically a novice in that part of somali history, you are just crying because you have no other fcats to defend your case. so shut the **** up.

Facts are Facts , what you are going to do about them ..nothing? so stop the wailing and whining.

The book is for people who at least have some sort of basic education and basic resreach knowledge , who can value facts based on its self regradless to clan. Now for your likes who whosrship the Mullah out of clannism your book is that of Idaajaa and Aw Jaamac, go worship the mullah and lit to lumbs of Uunsi for him

The book was not written for the likes of you so don't flatter yourself.

So you comparing the Prophet with the Mad Mullah? Is how the -Block see the Mad Mullah, how amazing these folks are. By the way the word shaydaan isn't even used in the book, so relax. However his poems are put into their context, he admitted he was a theif , a criminal and a coward who killed women and childern , and now somalis should feel sorry how he ended up. " Oh, Governor Archer! I am Seyyid Mohammed! I know you! When lately I was ill treated by the Italian Government, who caused trouble between myself, the, the and the ****** by giving firearms to my enemies, I warned the Italian Government that I was offended with them on account of their ill-treatment, and that I had moved to the British side of the border to avoid all fitna (quarrels). My intention then was to send you a letter with some of my elders and a caravan j but, before this could be done, you attacked me without any cause or fault of mine, and I am oppressed. Further, the aeroplanes have oppressively attacked me, and this is a great abuse to a man in my position. You have also killed forty of my children who were infants and innocents. You are, therefore, liable for their blood-money." I have heard that you are a good man and there are others who are my enemies. Iam, therefore, quite willing to undertake your settlement." He died a coward begging on his knees.

So he is olny dead when people mention his butchery and evil deeds!! or you telling us he is a alife when Idaajaa pander to him and peddle his history o VOA

a struggle against tthe italians is a struggle for somalia lool , its the same both are correct.

controversial!!!! no he is not , we have enough material written that support the fact that he was a theif, a looter and a libterine. Also we have what they argue is his poems which mostly an orgy of boast , blood and looting , we know of his relgious views and he stated in his letters to sheekh Cabdulaahi Al-Qudbi that the blood of muslim is permesiable and the looting of their porperty and the looting of their womenfolk, all in written . So whats so controversial about such a person!! simplty because few D clannist believe otherwise doesn`t make history conterversial.

Ch, Somali history is important you should be concerned with the habit of your age , hiphop and memorizing few lines and moves, once you grow up out of these teenag ephases then come and play with big boys. I have nicknamed you Mr 2 lines. I have read few of your comments mostly they are 2 lines , and in these tow lines you try to denfed your clann , but tow lines cant stand up against an entire book that took 6 years of reserach,. You have 2 choices either you refute the major points raised by the book or you take it as its , no amount of childish comments and scarasam will help the Mad Mullah, he was a coward , a libetrine and a man obsessed with the male manhood, if he happenes to be from your clan tough luck kid.

Che, You have no argument at all, so you are ignored till you get an argument other then Iam D and therefore i will defend D with anything . lool

Next time don't make hasty conclusion you might eat your word and get a kick in the face.