Pujah

Nomads
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    1,629

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Pujah

  9. Posted

    ^^ call them spontaneous.. :D

     

    _____________________________________

     

    Question:* Doctor, how many autopsies have you performed on dead people?

     

    Response:* All my autopsies are performed on dead people.

     

    _____________________________________

     

    Silly question don't you think

  12. Posted

    I can think of alot of parents that need dhaqan-celis more than their children. This whole thing is a way to blame the youth for their parents short comings...why have a kid if you can not be bothered to do disiplining yourself :mad:

  14. Posted

    Objectivists are violently opposed to utilitarianism. I believe this is because of objectivism's emphasis on the rights of the individual. To an objectivist, each person should live for his own benefit. now i am no philosopher but th "survival of the fitest" comes to mind" here...Utilitarianism on the other hand takes into account not only the individual’s values but all individuals. Basically acting for the “greater good for the greatest numberâ€

     

    now i have objections to objectivism and will show my reasoning later but nomads what is your take on this?

  16. Posted

    Here are the top 5 ways Women drive Men crazy

     

    5.Do not say what you mean. Ever.

     

    4. Stash feminine products in their backpacks and in their books as cute reminders that you were thinking of them.

     

    3. Look them in the eye and start laughing. specially during intimate moments

     

    2. Gather many female friends and dance to "I Will Survive" while they are present. Sing all the words. Sing to them. Sing loud.

     

    1. Plan little relationship anniversaries, i.e. the monthly anniversary of the time you saw each other in the library for five minutes.

    Then get mad at them for forgetting. Then cry.

     

     

     

    talk about copy and paste :D

  17. Posted

    let me make myself clear, I know its allowed and i am not against the sharia...but i believe i have a say in deciding whether i wanna share my huby or not...therefore, I would rather be single and happy then be married and miserable...if i was married and for unforsean reasons he decided to marry another my solution would have been to ask for D.I.V.O.R.C.E

  21. Posted

    Well yes and no.......there is one qabiil i wouldn't mary and it aint midgaan i tell ya...i don't believe in such things...but this particular tribe i just don't trust their women so i leave their guys alone :D

  24. Posted

    Congress Renews Interest in Identity Theft

     

    WASHINGTON - Responding to outrage from consumers whose personal information has been stolen from companies, Congress is primed to pass new laws to try to prevent break-ins and to require businesses to confess to customers when private data is taken.

     

    The government's new interest in requiring such embarrassing disclosures reverses years of efforts by the FBI and U.S. prosecutors to shield corporations that have been victims of hackers from bad publicity by keeping such crimes out of headlines.

     

    But now, consumers want to know if their private information has been stolen.

     

    The Senate is considering at least two proposals to crack down on companies suffering breaches of private customer information. The Federal Trade Commission's chairwoman has endorsed the idea and the Senate Judiciary Committee's chairman hinted this week that a new law might be inevitable.

     

    "We may well face a necessity for some really tough legislation," said Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa.

     

    The new push for government action responds to frustrated constituents who are among more than 10 million victims of identity theft each year. It comes after years of reluctance by most companies to voluntarily report break-ins that put customers' financial information at risk.

     

    "Congress is primed to take a very serious look at this and pass comprehensive legislation," said Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., sponsor for one bill. "Nobody has given this problem the focus it deserves. This is a high priority."

     

    A California law already requires disclosures to victimized consumers who live there, and roughly 30 states are looking at similar laws.

     

    "The last thing a merchant wants to do is tell all his longtime customers he's been hacked and lost all their information," said Keath Nupuf, chief technology officer for CardCops Inc. of Malibu, Calif. The company monitors Internet chat rooms and other hacker communications for stolen credit card numbers, then notifies merchants and consumers to block bad purchases.

     

    CardCops contacted 80 consumers earlier this week to report their card numbers and other personal details were circulating among Internet thieves, Nupuf said. The card numbers were pilfered from merchants that range from mom-and-pop shops to Fifth Avenue retailers.

     

    "One guy was blowing a blood vessel," he said. "He was going to drive across country and kill the merchant."

     

    Peiter "Mudge" Zatko, a computer expert who consulted for the White House during the Bush and Clinton administrations, often is hired by companies to tighten security and clean up the digital mess after a data breach. Zatko said victim companies "almost never" tell the FBI or customers when sensitive data is stolen.

     

    "Maybe they have a government contract and it would look bad," Zatko said. "Maybe they're trying to keep it quiet so they don't scare the financial markets."

     

    Sometimes companies warn customers. Howard Schmidt, a former White House adviser, said thieves took a computer this year from the store where he buys eyeglasses. The computer contained his credit and medical information, Schmidt said, but the owner contacted his customers and encouraged them to watch for fraudulent purchases.

     

    "That was a good thing," Schmidt said. "I want to do business with these guys."

     

    In a twist, the FBI and Justice Department have worked aggressively to shield the identities of corporations that have been hacking victims. To encourage businesses to contact them after such break-ins, U.S. investigators and prosecutors have publicly promised to seal court records, keep top executives off witness stands and use protective orders to keep details of these crimes out of the headlines.

     

    "There is still some reluctance to call law enforcement, some hesitancy because of the negative impact on reputation," said Amit Yoran, the Bush administration's former top cyber-security official. He said requiring companies to acknowledge a break-in "may be of value, but it should not be done as a knee-jerk reaction to the handful of high-profile and significant disclosures of the past few weeks."

     

    The FTC chairwoman, Deborah Majoras, estimated consumers lost $5 billion and businesses lost $48 billion because of identity theft in 2003. The FTC is studying how it can use existing banking statutes and laws against consumer fraud to prosecute companies that fail to report serious breaches.

     

    Majoras said government should consider requiring companies to tell customers about break-ins when thefts put them at financial risk. She also endorsed minimum security requirements for businesses that collect sensitive personal information.

     

    "The challenge is to come up with a way of defining when notice should be sent and when it doesn't make sense," said Joel Winston, associate director at the FTC's division for financial practices.

     

    ---

     

    On the Net:

     

    Federal Trade Commission: http://www.ftc.gov

     

    CardCops: http://www.cardcops.com