Guzel

Nomads
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    96

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Guzel

  1. Posted

    Che, i am married, my friend who is here with me posted this thread because she cannot be bothered to create an account just for this thread. I am not trolling and hardly post in this forum.

  2. Posted

    Cambuulo iyo bun;974794 wrote:
    LOL if y'all are dry humping why not do the whole shebang?

    He does no want to, does not want his private parts to be touched, does not want to be blown, bitten. When i use my tongue on his neck and ear, wu iska tir tira my saliva, so i stopped doing it.

  3. Posted

    Che -Guevara;974791 wrote:
    Sheekadu dry humping haday gaadhey, it might be above my pay grade. That said, ultimately a man has control over his urges, but in the context of intimate relationship where sex is implicitly and explicitly expected. It is difficult not act on one's urges.
    On different point, kissing will set him off but not dry humping
    ...haha

    Exactly my point, he is the one who puts a stop to the dry humping, i go with the flow and don't resist it, he can then also do the same with kissing if he wanted to. He is full of BS.

  4. Posted

    Che -Guevara;974785 wrote:
    Innocent, nagadaa qofyahay. Nothing innocent about two grown azz people exchanging salive. It is only natural he wants to exchange other internal body secretions.

     

    Coofle. You forget the fondling part, which could me anything haha

    By innocent i mean a kiss will emotionally connect me to him further, it is what i would remember after he leaves my place, he is not opening up to me, i don't want just dry humping, which is fine but without the kissing part, i am left feeling there is something missing.

  5. Posted

    I am asking men in general, is there a point you would stop at before you lose control or isn't that we are always in control and in charge of our minds and bodies. I think a kiss is innocent and should not be witheld, it is the start of intimacy so how can he say it will make him lose control?

  6. Posted

    This is a question to the men, would you restrain yourself from a passionate kiss with a lady you are seeing if both of you have decided not to have sex, but occasionally enjoy fondling, a bit of foreplay? The man in question refuses to kiss,bite, use his tongue, his excuse is it will set him off and he would not be able to stop himself from having full sex? I am finding it hard to believe him, what do you think?

  7. Posted

    There is no such thing as "head of the household" in a marriage. Marriage is based on mutual decisions, listening to each other and compromise. It is a partnership and vague terms such as "head of the household" are meaningless. Somali women have worked as maids from Yemen to Italy after the war, in Europe they are mostly cleaners. If it was not for them, many families back home would be facing starvation.

  8. Posted

    Men, women and children all need a movement to empower them. Somali women are victims of lawlessness first, we can overcome the patriarchal aspect of our culture.

  12. Posted

    Mad_Mullah;957926 wrote:
    The 3ilmanis are the elite, the ones that bleach their hair and wear blue contact lenses so that they can look European. But they are an minority with the majority being on Erdogan's side.

     

    But the problem is the media is controlled by these secular movements. Turkey was about to become a super power if it continued in it's path but, Congrats US/Europe they took out another Islamic power. Who's next.

    They are not a tiny minority to be described as elites, you will find secular Turks from middle and working classes. Some of them have voted for Erdogan but are finding him increasingly authoritarian.

  13. Posted

    Turkey is a secular country and the 3ilmanis are Turks, not foreigners imposing a foreign law. Protests happen in Taksim area almost every day about all types of issues, Erdogan managed to turn a small protest into anti government riot. I support him on most issues especially his stance on alcohol but he got this wrong.

  16. Posted

    warsamaale;957173 wrote:
    The gist of your argument is about the race of the perpetrators and how to make them look less bad. why not worry about the victims instead of the perpetrators ???

    A lot of honest Asian Muslims have spoken about it and admitted it was a problem for their, most of the tip offs come from the same community and the main persecutor was an Asian Muslim who was threatened and insulted as a result. it would be a sick society if we can't criticize a person or a group for their malignant behaviors.

    Stay on topic, we are discussing the link between sexual grooming and race, religion. No need to make me out as if I dont care about the victims. The Rochdale sex leader was convicted of attacking an Asian girl. The Eritrean Oxford sex leader who stood out from the rest of the men because of his cruelty and sadism had a white girlfriend he did not abuse. Why is it mainly men of Pakistani origin and not Bangladeshi who have been involved in group sex grooming? The two communities are very similar. You are naive if you think these Pakistani men would not have abused a Muslim Bangladeshi or a Hindu woman for example, if they did not abuse one of their own, it is because fear of repercussion. It is not a black or white issue but you have fallen for the anti Muslim, anti immigration right wing propaganda.

     

    I have not read that tip offs came from the Asian community, the police and social workers knew what was going on but failed to do their job and it was often made difficult by the victims who sometimes withdrew their complaints. What the Asian community can do is not turn a blind eye because the victim is an "outsider" and dismiss them as sexually loose girls.

  17. Posted

    warsamaale;957167 wrote:
    Lets be honest, this crime of sex grooming is exclusively done by Asian Muslim men, and no they would not have done the same thing on Asian Muslim girls if you listen to them, they clearly look down on the white girls as worthless meat to be utilized. I'm sure the same thing happened in our country and foreigners were targeting our children, we would be appalled and we want our press to point out and demonize the criminals. But in Britain you'd want a liberal pansy pliable media not to point the warts and shameful deeds of foreigners. double standards

    Online sex grooming is exclusively done by white men, I look forward to TV programs discussing their race and religion as a factor.

     

    Reeyo - They did not target white girls, they groomed vulnerable girls from broken backgrounds who often stayed out late. Majority of them happened to be white because of the demographics of those cities.

  18. Posted

    warsamaale;957159 wrote:
    What a pathetic and lame excuse. if i may ask you, why do you particularly care if its asian men who are behind this ?

    I do not care because they are asian but because I am against the demonisation of any particular community/ religion for a crime that is perpetrated by all races.

  20. Posted

    I agree with Tallaboo, not at every mosque but we have a tendency to sit and listen to hate speech at sermons. Recently it is anti shia rhetoric that is being spewed across some mosques because of what is going on in Syria, people might condemn it amongst themselves but action should be taken by mosques not to tolerate hate speech.

  21. Posted

    I dont think this thread gives us a negative image however none of the criminals did what they did because they are "Somalis" for this reason, this thread serves no purpose. Somalis are not in denial about crime committed by young people, it is discussed openly. Saying so, this is my favourite thread and i check it out regularly.